Answer:
It is true that Minimus's poem tries to make Napoleon out to be a god.
Explanation:
'Animal Farm' is a novel written by George Orwell.The novel is a fable picturizing the Russian Revolution of 1917.
In Chapter 8, when Napoleon took over the office of 'Leadership', Minimus wrote a poem in his honor. In his poem, he portrayed Napoleon out to be god.
His poem, in second stanza, said
<em>'Thou are the giver of
</em>
<em>All that thy creatures love,
</em>
<em>Full belly twice a day, clean straw to roll upon;
</em>
<em>Every beast great or small
</em>
<em>Sleeps at peace in his stall,
</em>
<em>Thou watchest over all,
</em>
<em>Comrade Napoleon!'</em>
By stating that Napoleon <em>looks over all of his creature</em> and <em>they sleep in peace in his stall</em>, Minimus's poem is picturizing Napoleon to be god. Just like God watches over all His creation, and they sleep in peace in His stall, Minimus picturized Napoleon in the same picture.
D to get home
I believe get is an adverb
Answer: Hello, I can give you some summarys but i dont know if it wold help so.......
Explanation: Shortly after Herbert’s execution, Stevenson visits death row to catch up with several new clients, including Walter. Afterward, he travels to Monroeville to meet Walter’s large extended family. Gathered together in a small trailer, they passionately explain to Stevenson their indignation at Walter’s conviction, particularly when they were all with him at the time of the murder. Stevenson writes that the family’s hums of agreement were the kind of “wordless testimony of struggle and anguish” he heard “all the time growing up in a rural black church.” Walter’s sister Armelia expresses that the court’s dismissal of Walter’s alibi makes her feel that she has been “convicted too.” A debate arises about whether or not Walter, whom they call “Johnny D”, even needed an alibi, given his upstanding character.
Answer: B. Locking women away behind walls, screens, or curtains robs them of their dignity.
Explanation:
The author of this poem, Sarojini Naidu (1879 - 1946), came from a culture where women were to receive a different treatment from men. Women's freedom was taken away with the excuse of protecting them from "eyes impure". If their bodies and faces, their beauty and youth cannot be seen, then they will not be coveted. However, such a way of "protecting" has its own way of harming those involved. It does not "shield a woman's eyes from tears". It does not protect their feelings, does not take their wishes into consideration. It only limits their lives, their abilities, their happiness.
