Ethics refers to acceptable conduct in any setting therefore it concernscconcerns the behaviour thebehavioithbusiness
Answer: infant industry argument
Explanation:
The infant industry argument simply means that the new industries in a particular economy should be protected at all cost from the multinationals or already developed foreign firms so that they themselves can grow and that the foreign firms will not hinder their progress and growth.
This usually applies to small and newly established firms. One of the main reason for taxation is to help protect such industries from competition thqt can hinder them.
Answer:
$750
Explanation:
If I pick $1,000, and the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is 0.75, it means that while travelling the state, I will have spent $750 on goods and services either produced and traded in that state, or only traded in that state (while having been produced in other place). This is the total impact that I will have made on the economy of this state.
The remaining $250 that I will have saved will only impact the economy of the state if I deposit or invest the money in a financial institution located in the state. If instead, I invest those saving in some other state, or put the money under the mattress in my house (located in another state), my savings will not impact the economy of the state in any way whatsoever.
Answer:
Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
Explanation:
The above question is incomplete as there are several answer options which are listed below;
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got
• Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury
• Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury
• Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill's injury.
The above answer - Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury, is true according to the rule of privity of contract. The rule states that a person who is not a party to a contract does not have right to sue or be sued and to enforce the obligations arising from the contract, unlike a person who is a party to the contract.
With regards to the above scenario, Lexi, who buys a food processor is the party to the contract here, hence can sue and be sued in case of any injury suffered by her, however, Jill whom food processor was loaned to, is the third party here, hence not covered by the rule of privity of contract.
Answer:
Disposable Income
Explanation:
dis·pos·a·ble in·come
/dəˈspōzəbəl ˈinˌkəm,dəˈspōzəbəl ˈiNGˌkəm/
Learn to pronounce
noun
income remaining after deduction of taxes and other mandatory charges, available to be spent or saved as one wishes.
"the rents of tenants in work reached 21 percent of disposable income"
