Answer:
because it showed that we could pull off something that big and that we were more than capable of doing so
Explanation:
I trust “<u>Source 1</u>”
<u>Explanation</u>:
I would trust the Source 1 i.e., the “Sworn testimony by American Sergeant in Congressional hearings in 1969” more because a sworn testimony is a gold evidence for the Congressional hearings. It won’t affect a person i.e., the Sergeant in any way. Maybe the testimony can get corrupted by lying, forcing and constraining, and the shaking the human memory. But in a speech by the General can affect his reputation as he can hid the truth and lie in his speech. So, the sworn testimony is more reliable than the speech.
1. C
2.B
3.A
4.A
5.B
6.Nile river valley, Northern coast, Southern tip
Lesson4:Early Civilizations of Africa World History A Unit 10: The Muslim World and Africa
Answers 100% right
The people in the Asian nations under the rule of imperialism don't have the ability to vote. only a certain people do, which still elects the same ruler.
Two of the most significant <span>impacts that the scramble for Africa left in Africa were 1) political instability and 2) ethnic tensions, since the invading Europeans had no regard for preexisting tribal boundaries. </span>