Answer:
Lemon v. Kurtzman
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the attorney will most likely consult the case of Lemon v. Kurtzman in 1971. This is because both this situation and the Lemon v. Kurtzman case deal with government interaction and funding of private religious schools for non-religious purchases. Therefore this case would have invaluable information for your case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Sherry is experiencing a disorder which is called the paranoid personality disorder of which she shows distrust towards others or suspiciousness towards other people. It could be seen above as she shows distrust and suspiciousness to the government, because of this she shows odd behaviors that will most likely contribute to she has the presence of the disorder that she is now experiencing.
Emotional intelligence can neutralize toxic individuals by putting emphasis on positive feelings.
<h3>What is Emotional intelligence?</h3>
Emotional intelligence can be defined as the ability of a person to handle situations due to his/her positive attitude.
Emotional intelligence can neutralize toxic persons by focusing on the solutions instead of problems, which balances any negative thought.
In conclusion, emotional intelligence can neutralize toxic individuals by putting emphasis on the positive feelings.
Learn more about emotional intelligence here:
brainly.com/question/7905042
#SPJ1
Answer: The pope should not sell indulgences to pay for the building of a church.
Explanation:
Martin Luther is the first person in history to speak out publicly against the Catholic Church. Luther pointed to certain irregularities within the church. He primarily rebelled against the sale of forgiveness of sins. Luther "started an avalanche" of reform movements that spread from Germany to the rest of Europe.
Answer:
I believe it is B.
Explanation:
C is most definitely wrong. The Constitution makes no mention of non citizens at all. Only in later amendments is Citizenship defined. So the most rational answer would be B, considering that citizen, was a much more general term at the time of the creation of the Constitution.
