Answer:
B. Weber's law.
Explanation:
Weber's law: The Weber's law is also known as the Weber-Fechner law and is defined as the size of JND i.e, just noticeable difference (represented with delta I) is of constant proportion to that of the value of the original stimulus. In other words, the law states that the increment threshold ratio concerning the background intensity is similar.
Example: A person needs to shout to be heard by the person in any noisy place.
In the question above, the given statement best illustrates the Webers's law.
The correct answer is C. Eventually
Explanation:
An appropriate transition should always show the relationship between two sentences or two grammatical elements. In the case of the sentence "The Tennessee Valley Authority erected 20 dams, ________ providing much-needed jobs for up to 40,000 workers" it is suggested the jobs given to 40,000 workers were the result or consequence to the construction of 20 dams.
According to this, it is necessary to include a consequence transition such as therefore, thus or eventually. This means in this case the best option is "eventually" because this is the only transition that shows the consequence relationship between the two sentences; while the transition "because of" is used to show cause, "despite" is used to show contrast and "in addition" is used to add information.
The correct answer is D- this is a tax paid by someone who inherits money from someone who's died.
A potential confuser, the excise tax is a tax on certain goods, such as tobacco.
Yes, you can microwave hots dogs out of its package.
Answer:
One problem regarding inconsistency in moral reasoning is that it affects the harmony between our actions and inner values.
Explanation:
Moral Reasoning refers to the way in which a person identifies what is right and wrong. He uses <u>logic</u> in order to deal with this. This guides the principles that a person follows in life. This can be affected by several factors such as: <em>intelligence, age, emotion, how the child was brought up, to name a few.</em>
<u>Consistency in moral reasoning means that a person's actions and inner values should be "consistent" or in harmony with each other.</u> For example, if a person knows that throwing garbage along the river is bad, then he doesn't do that. He also acts as an advocate by telling people not to do it as well.
Once inconsistency occurs in moral reasoning, it causes a disharmony between the actions and inner values. It makes the person confused on what to do in his life. It becomes harder for him to follow the right path.
