1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marianna [84]
3 years ago
9

Why do you think Mark Twain uses a young boy as the main character and narrator of the novel?

English
2 answers:
In-s [12.5K]3 years ago
6 0

There are several reasons why Mark Twain uses a young boy as the main character and narrator of the novel. For example, a young boy is more likely to be involved in adventurous or risky behaviour, which makes the novel more exciting. However, the main reason why Twain does this is because a young boy can look at human institutions in a more naive and less biased way. Therefore, through the eyes of our protagonist, Twain can criticize and comment on the way of life of Americans, including some uniquely American elements, such as slavery.

OLEGan [10]3 years ago
5 0
There are several reasons why Twain chooses a young boy to tell the story in The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. First of all, Huck originally showed up in the story, The Adventures of Tom Sawyer as Tom’s sidekick. Twain took the character, Huck, and developed a more symbolic picaresque novel that contained satire and the rite of passage of a young boy. Twain wanted The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn to be more than just...
You might be interested in
Write a five paragraph essay at least 200 words long on a topic of your choice. You must use one of the following essay types.
Vladimir79 [104]
<span>Persuasive Essay
</span><span>
Why There Must Be Qualification Tests for Voting 

</span>

In western democratic societies, people have gotten used to almost absolute freedom: of speech, consciousness, self-expression, gender roles, and so on. Freedom of political will is among the benefits American and European societies enjoy as well; no one can be forced to vote this or that way, and even though during elections politicians fall over themselves to convince the electorate to vote in their favor, there are no guns pressed to voters’ heads: a person is free to vote any way he or she likes, or to not vote at all. At the same time, voting is not just a right: it is also a great responsibility of every member of a society, because each vote contributes to the results of elections, which in their turn will define the way society will have to live until the next election.

And this is probably the greatest catch: since in modern democratic societies a right to vote is granted to any citizen having reached a certain biological age, the political future of each particular society depends on a large mass of random people. In other words, not only knowledgeable, intelligent, conscious, and competent people with reasonable political positions can vote—and this is a problem. Why? Let us figure out why.

He suggests that people who know little to none about politics, how governments and economies work, and how political solutions affect societies—in other words, people ignorant about politics—should not be allowed to vote.

It might sound shocking at first, but people have got so used to their rights and freedoms that even the slightest limitation looks like totalitarianism to them. But, for example, how many Americans unsatisfied with Donald Trump’s rule are there? How quickly has his rating dropped since the moment he was elected a president of the United States? This data can be gathered on the Internet easily, so there is no point in discussing it here; what is important, however, is how Trump became president, and what was his target audience. Attentive observers must have noticed how primitive and naive his speeches were, how easily he blamed everyone, promised to build those infamous walls against migrants, and “Make America great again.. If his electoral base was not so ignorant and craving for quick solutions, it would question their candidate more, and would probably find out that there was no solid basis behind his loud words; as a result, America might have had a different president now, and the whole political course of the country could have been different.

Ignorant and poorly-educated people always make the majority of the population. Ancient Greeks knew that; nowadays praised for inventing the democratic form of rule, Greeks had numerous limitations for those who wanted to participate in the political life of their society. Many of them would be unreasonable to implement today: to tell a long story short, a right to vote belonged only to free male citizens of Ancient Greece’s cities (Inside Loyola), and some Greek city-states also required voters to match additional criteria, such as education or a certain level of income. This way, Greeks filtered those social categories who were biased towards certain subjects; for example, poor people would obviously vote for candidates who promised to make them rich, ignorant and uneducated people would vote for those who promised them unearthly goods and happiness, and so on. By granting the right to vote to few, Greeks ensured that those few were educated, knew about the current problems of the city-state they lived in, understood how the system worked, and were interested in the best possible outcomes for everyone could vote.


The idea of making citizens pass a special test to ensure their ability to make informed decisions during elections might seem limiting and somewhat authoritarian. Many people have got so used to their rights and freedoms that the idea of even the slightest limitation makes them scared. However, there are reasons to believe that qualification tests could not damage, but heal and improve the political system of the United States, because such tests would ensure that, metaphorically speaking, little children will not put forks into electrical sockets—meaning that ignorant people who have no idea about how the United States’ society works will not be able to affect its life through voting during its elections.


there you go, its the whole essay! ;}

<span>


</span>
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the error with subject-verb agreement. Select the incorrect verb and type it correctly.
maw [93]

Answer:

The error is in the use of "was" before the subjects "pollution and disease".

The incorrect verb is "was".

The correct sentence will be <em>"pollution and disease were to blame for the decimation of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population in the 1990s"</em>.

Explanation:

When we say the subject-verb agreement, then it means that the helping verb used is dependent on the number of the subject(s). This means that if the subject is singular, then the verb will be singular, and if it is plural, then the verb also becomes plural.

Now, taking the given sentence, we can see that the subjects are <em>"pollution and disease"</em>, which is plural in nature. The use of "and" makes it plural, thereby making the use of the singular verb "was" wrong.

Thus, the correct sentence will be <u><em>"pollution and disease were to blame for the decimation of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population in the 1990s".</em></u>

4 0
2 years ago
Why is recognizing an author's purpose important?
katen-ka-za [31]

Answer:

D

Explanation:

An author will not continue writing if he/she does not have the right demographic or if their work doesn't even do well. If him/her perpourse was recognized, he/she would keep writing.

Hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Review the phrase fragment.Ferns and tiny wildflowers grew. Which best corrects the phrase fragment? Along the narrow forest tra
ziro4ka [17]

Along The Forest Trail Ferns and Tiny wildflowers grow

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the rhyme scheme add to the meaning and tone of the poem support your answer with specific evidence from the text (
IrinaK [193]

We can actually deduce here that the rhyme scheme actually adds rhythm to the meaning and creates an optimistic mood in the tone of the poem.

An evidence is seen in stanza 2 of the poem:

In the fell clutch of circumstance

I have not winced nor cried aloud.

Under the bludgeonings of chance

My head is bloody, but unbowed.

<h3>What is Invictus?</h3>

Invictus is a poem that was written by  William Ernest Henley. The poem actually refers to the themes of suffering and rejuvenation,. It also showcases the theme of fatalism and free will.

The poem has a rhyme scheme of ABAB CDCD EFEF GHGH. It is known to possess a set of metrical pattern. The poem consists of each line that has eight syllables and the stress usually falls on the stress of each foot.

Invictus is known to be a Victorian poem.

Learn more about Invictus on brainly.com/question/13518618

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • One way to become comfortable with a text before reading it is to:
    14·1 answer
  • What are three ways you can avoid plagiarism when writing your informational text?
    8·1 answer
  • The word catastrophe includes a Greek root strophe that means _____.
    9·2 answers
  • Read the lines from "All the World's a Stage" and answer the question.
    6·1 answer
  • Why does Montresor keep suggesting they go back?
    9·1 answer
  • Which theme from Romeo and Juliet is reflected in this excerpt? Fate helps people feel less regret about their decisions. Fate p
    14·2 answers
  • In Mia style what is the correct format for a website in a works cited entry
    15·1 answer
  • 10. A word ending with the suffix ist most likely describes:
    15·2 answers
  • Please help! It's due at 12!! <br> I'll give brainlist!
    11·2 answers
  • I read about it in the paper, in the
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!