The answer is B
explanation
Outliers are the samples that lie away from others
The piece of evidence that best supports a written argument encouraging students to eat less candy is : ( C ) numerous health issues are connected to sugar consumption
<h3>Effect of sugar on our health </h3>
The piece of evidence "numerous health issues are connected to sugar consumption" will best discourage the consumption of candy as they contain a significant amount of sugar which will pose a threat our health. Every student want a healthy life therefore this evidence will encourage them to eat less candy.
Hence we can conclude that The piece of evidence that best supports a written argument encouraging students to eat less candy is : ( C ) numerous health issues are connected to sugar consumption
Learn more about Candy consumption : brainly.com/question/24860176
#SPJ1
Originally, the SAT I was meant to test aptitude and the SAT II was meant to test achievement. That is to say, one tested what you were capable of and the other tested what you knew. But when the College Board moved away from the idea that the SAT I tests innate ability, they framed it as a reasoning test, making the difference between the two less defined.
With the latest changes, the SAT I (now just the SAT) is more focused than ever testing knowledge rather than logic. At this point, I would say that the SAT tests general knowledge and and the Subject Tests assess topical knowledge.
