1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
S_A_V [24]
4 years ago
7

What argument is Wiesel making in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech? A. The Holocaust was a terrible time in history. B. Countri

es should be allowed to police themselves. C. Men and women will always struggle for freedom. D. The world must take sides against injustice.
English
2 answers:
babunello [35]4 years ago
5 0

Answer: D. The world must take sides against injustice.

Elie Wiesel was born in present-day Romania. During World War II, he and his family were deported to an extermination camp. Only Wiesel and his two older sisters survived. He was liberated from Buchenwald in 1945, and in 1958 he published his book, <em>Night</em>. In his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, Wiesel reminds us that learning about the importance of the Holocaust is not enough. It is necessary for people to take a side against injustice. He believed that the opposite of love was not hate, but indifference and that a struggle against indifference was a struggle for peace.

snow_tiger [21]4 years ago
3 0
The correct option is D.
Wiesel was given a Nobel Peace Prize in 1986 as a recognition for his works in promoting human rights. At that time he was a University professor and he worked on behalf of the oppressed people. He believed that people must take side against injustice because been neutral or keeping quiet only help the oppressors to inflict more affliction.<span />
You might be interested in
What's my name? whats my name.... Say it louder.
Pepsi [2]

Answer:

Descendants 2

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
If you are using a pre-planned mosaic from a book, which is the next main step you will need to complete?
solong [7]
I think it might be D.
4 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes how the structure of these excerpts helps to develop the themes?
kompoz [17]

The theme of a passage often portray a particular meaning.  The statement that best describes how the structure is The parallelism in "An Irish Airman Foresees His Death" emphasizes the idea that the speaker identifies himself as an Irishman, while the refrains in "Do not go gentle into that good night" emphasize the speaker’s vehement opposition to death.

  • The passage is simply emphasizes on the fact that death is predictable by an Irish Airman. That is they can see their death hours before it happens as they have special signs that tell them what will happen.

Many people are not often prepared to die and when any situation arises that may warrant it, they try their best possible to avoid dying.

See full question below

Which statement best describes how the structure of these excerpts helps to develop the themes? The refrains of "An Irish Airman Foresees His Own Death" stress that life and death are balanced, while the parallel structure of "Do not go gentle into that good night" stresses that men of all ages should fight against their oncoming demise. The repetitions and refrains in both excerpts develop the theme that death cannot be avoided, no matter how hard one struggles against it. Both the parallel structure in the excerpt of "An Irish Airman Foresees His Own Death" and the repetition in the excerpt from "Do not go gentle into that good night" emphasize the inevitability of death. The parallelism in "An Irish Airman Foresees His Death" emphasizes the idea that the speaker identifies himself as an Irishman, while the refrains in "Do not go gentle into that good night" emphasize the speaker’s vehement opposition to death.

Learn more about this passage from

brainly.com/question/4618060

6 0
2 years ago
Rewrite the sentence in passive voice: I forgot to feed the fish before I left this morning.
Kipish [7]

Answer:

Before leaving this morning i forgot to feed the fish

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read the paragraph from a student’s literary essay comparing two different works.
Sholpan [36]
The correct answer for this question would be option A. Based on the given paragraph from a student’s literary essay comparing two different works, the paragraph would support the idea that Micaela <span> wishes her heritage was different because she has difficulty relating to her grandmother. Hope this answer helps.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the theme of "Casey at the bat"?by Ernest LawrenceThayer
    10·2 answers
  • Understanding texts with difficult words can be made easier by a study of all except _____.
    9·1 answer
  • How does the theme of self-destruction
    5·1 answer
  • Which rhetorical appeal is used in the text, “I have been a nurse for over twenty years”?
    13·2 answers
  • Ture or false Increasingly, common people wanted a say in Government
    11·2 answers
  • What do you think causes Sykes to behave the way he does? Based on your understanding of his character and motivations, does he
    15·1 answer
  • Which word in paragraph 4 helps the reader understand the meaning of the word contingent?
    11·1 answer
  • A
    7·2 answers
  • Write a letter of apology for not attending friend's birthday party​
    10·1 answer
  • Using practical illustrations in politics, religion, law and medicine explain why value judgement, unlike a factual statement sh
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!