I believe the answer is: <span>If someone is asked to describe a meaningless, ambiguous stimulus, her response will be a projection of her inner thoughts and emotional processes.
By analyzing this response to ambiguous stimulus, the psychologist could analyze the subconscious mind that the subject have since the response would not be filtered by conscious desire to be seen in a positive light by other people near the subject.</span><span>
</span>
Men didn't allow women to get as much education men. Women didn't like the fact that men got the chance to vote and they didn't. In the 1800's Men were sexist, it's wrong! Forever will it be wrong! I HATE SEXISM! EVERYONE ARE EQUAL MEN, WOMEN, BLACK, WHITE, JAPANESE, CHINESE, ASIA, AND SO FORTH. Literally everyone is equal. And I hate racism as well.
Answer:
A). Subjects who were given misleading information after viewing the slides were far less accurate in their memories for the kind of sign present than were subjects who were given no such information.
Explanation:
As per the given example, option A displays the results or consequences of the given study which researched the 'impacts of various types of information on human memory'. The results would reveal that 'subjects who were offered misleading information were less correct in their memories in comparison to the subjects who were not proffered with any such information' as the wrong or misinformation leads to form inaccurate or false memories in their mind which implies that 'memories can not be reliable'. Therefore, <u>option A</u> is the correct answer.
The percentage of cases where the victim/survivor and the person who harms them know one another is 90%.
<h3>What is crime?</h3>
Crime can be described as the unlawful act which is punishable by a state or other authority.
It should be noted that in modern criminal law, there is simple and universally accepted definition and also in statutory definitions it is the same.
It should be noted that percentage of cases where the victim/survivor and the person who harms them know one another is 90%.
Crime is usually punishable under the law, and it is not adviceable under law, however every state or country have the rules as well as the regulations guiding them, and any citizens that doesn't abide with the order as well as the rule has committed a crime because there is no ignorance under the law. In this case all the rules and the regulations of the country should be followed by citizens since any deviation is punishable under the law. Hence all laws of the country should be abided with by the citizens.
Learn more on crime at:
brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.
- In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
- The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.
Learn about more Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
