Answer:
The price of a Dinner= $6.22
Explanation:
<em>Mark-up is the proportion of the product cost which is expected to be made as profit. In other words, it is profit expressed as a percentage of product cost.</em>
To account for the spoilage rate of 10%, $3.50 unit cost would be consider as 90% of the cost. Thus, 100% of the cost would be given as follows:
Dinner cost = 100/(100-10)× 3.50= 3.89
The price of a Dinner = product cost + 60% of product cost
The price of a Dinner = 3.89 + 60%*3.89= $6.22
The price of a Dinner= $6.22
Answer:
International business is a affects the domestic economy in many ways.
Explanation:
- The impacts of international trade can vary from the supply and demand of a particular good or product and their impact on the domestic market functioning. The price changes in the market affect the wages received by the workers as trade opens new foreign markets.
- The supply of the products is depended on the demands of the consumers which may be affected by the government policies, and many socio-cultural aspects.
- International trade leads to the increase of the value of the products and thus increases in the demands and the competitiveness of the market, for this, the government provides a subsidy to the domestic infant industries to protect them from getting removed for the competition.
- Due to the competition, the firms try to sell their product at a lower or higher cost thereby increasing the quantity demanded by the customer. Thus the equilibrium of the price and quantity demanded changes.
True total utility always decreases when marginal utility is present
Answer: None of the above
Explanation:
All of the above are correct.
For option A, Economists who advocate discretionary monetary policy do indeed believe that the monetary authority using this policy is more flexible to shape the best monetary policy to the existing circumstances.
Option B is also correct because Crowding out occurs when the government increases investment by borrowing which leaves less money for the private sector to borrow so they spend less. The government spent money here yet the private sector did not spend less so it is Zero Crowing out.
Option C by option B's explanation holds true because the entire amount the Government increased by was denied the private sector.
Option D is also true as not all Economists prefer rule-based monetary policy to discretionary monetary policy.
They are all true.
