The way the emotional appeal in these arguments are similar is that A. both appeal to a sense of national pride
<h3>What is Emotional Appeal?</h3>
This refers to the persuasive appeal which is also a rhetorical appeal that is used to try to convince a person about something, by appealing to his emotions and not logic.
Hence, we can see that based on the complete text, there are two arguments that are used to try and convince people about the national pride that they would have if they acted in a particular way.
The speaker focused on the issue of nationalism, independence, and autonomy as he rallied the American colonists to try and rebel against the British so they could form their own government.
Read more about emotional appeals here:.
brainly.com/question/1837090
#SPJ1
Answer:
It allows you to be an effective observer
Explanation:
The objectivity allows the observations to be made in a very specific way, preventing the creation of biases and allowing the generation of comprehensive conclusions that determine the positive and negative points of any system that is being observed. Thus, we can say that objectivity encourages efficient observation, allowing the observer to be very effective in his actions. In other words, objectivity allows an individual to be an excellent observer.
An inquiry about the best way to stay in contact
Answer:
Because they had the similar beliefs.
Explanation:
Both John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau believed that in the state of nature all men had natural rights and followed natural God given or inherent laws that signified the freedom of men from tyranny.
hope this helps! :)
