The answer is A. Mitosis results in daughter cells through one division cycle while meiosis results in haploid gametes through two division cycles.
Ooh this will be good
So blood let’s say starts in the left atrium where it goes down through the mitral valve into the left ventricle. From the left ventricle of the blood is pushed through the aorta and from there through the various branches of the body eventually allowing oxygen rich blood to flow all across the body. Once this blood is picked up by veins as deoxygenated blood it goes back to the heart through the inferior and superior vena cava. From there the deoxygenated blood is sent into the right atrium, through the tricuspid vale into the right ventricle, through the pulmonic valve into the pulmonary artery and into the lungs for re-oxygenation. The re-oxygenated blood (oxygen rich blood) now goes through the pulmonary veins into the left atrium and the cycle beings again.
Remember this, Left side of heart is for oxygenated blood, Right side of heart is for deoxygenated blood.
Artery takes oxygen rich blood away from heart itself
Vein takes oxygen poor blood back into the heart
Exceptions, Pulmonary Artery takes oxygen poor blood away from heart and into lungs
Pulmonary vein takes oxygen rich blood into the left atrium to be pushed to the rest of e body.
Answer: Here you go!
Explanation:
Doubling the amount of grass would definitely increase the rabbit population since there is more food/resources for it to produce. Since the food chain has a domino effect everything else would go up as well because of the increase of food/resources that will help sustain the population of all. so for the first line it would be increase for rabbit snake and hawk. Halving the amount of grass would effect the population of all animals as well. But in a more negative way. It would decrease because the rabbits wouldn't have enough food to produce and thrive. With the decline of rabbits less snakes will live because of the low amount of their main food source. Same with the eagles. So therefore it would be decrease in all the bottom lines.
Answer:
4, 5, 11, 10, 12, 3, 9, 2, 6, 8, 7, 1
I might have messed up but i believe this is correct.
Explanation:
Answer: 1/16, or approximately 6.25% (see explanation below)
Explanation:
Answering this question requires two steps.
First, we need to figure out the probability that this couple will have a child with albinism in the first place. We know the following:
- Both parents are unaffected.
- The couple has already had one affected child.
- Albinism follows an autosomal recessive inheritance pattern.
Let ( M = normal gene ) and ( m = mutated gene ). Since the condition is recessive, the affected child can be assumed to have a “mm” genotype. Barring the possibility of a de novo mutation (which are assumed to be rare), the affected child must have inherited one ”m” allele from each parent. Since both of them are unaffected, however, we can assume that they are both carriers (genotype “Mm”). In conclusion, 1/4 of their offspring (25%) <em>for any given pregnancy</em> may be expected to have albinism. See the resulting Punnett square:
<u> | M | m </u>
<u>M | MM | Mm </u>
<u>m | Mm | mm </u>
Note that the question asks about the probability that not one but two consecutive births result in affected children. Since it can be assumed that both events are independent (meaning: the outcome of a pregnancy does not influence the outcome of following ones), we may apply the rule of multiplication for probabilities. The final answer is therefore 1/4 * 1/4 = 1/16.
