What the three cases have in common is that they were all victories for the people and their amendment guaranteed rights against states who wanted to obstruct those. The first case was about preventing states from limiting freedom of speech, the second was about preventing illegally obtained evidence from being used in court, and the third was that the states have an obligation to provide a lawyer to criminals if they can't pay for them.
<span>"b. It was vague and its parameters were hard to define" was a criticism made of George H.W. Bush's New World Order, since he only spoke of global governance. </span>
A. Truman Doctrine, it was an American policy to contain soviet expansion during the Cold War
Answer:
D. They believed that representatives were better able to vote on national
issues than ordinary citizens were.
Explanation:
Mills vs. Board of Education was a lawsuit filed against the District of Columbia in the early 70s. The lawsuit was on the behalf of 7 disabled children who were denied access to a public school education because it was thought that their needs were too great for them to be able to be educated in a public school setting (it was also said by the Board that it would be too expensive to educate them).
