Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
The infliction of mental suffering is usually easier to detect than other forms of abuse. This statement is True
<h3>
What is Mental suffering?</h3>
- Mental suffering, sometimes known as "mental anguish," is the discomfort, dysfunction, or misery of the mind; it typically follows bodily pain or injury.
- It also refers to emotional distress brought on by another person's actions, including extremely unpleasant feelings like worry, despair, sorrow, grief, horror, shame, or rage.
- It is significant to remember that discomfort, whether mental or emotional, is typically brought on by an outside source and, when severe enough, may serve as a foundation for suing for damages in a tort case.
- As long as it is reasonable to assume that mental trauma would naturally result from the incident, physical injuries is typically not required in order to obtain damages for mental suffering.
- The objective test for determining whether such an assumption is acceptable calls for a cap on compensation for non-economic damages of between $250,000 and $500,000 for all non-economic damages.
To know more about mental suffering with the given link brainly.com/question/10449105
#SPJ4
Answer:
A weak or flawed person with no standing. Also called man of straw. See judgment proof. More On This Topic. Legal Aid: Free And Low-Cost Help When You Need It. Eleven Types of Legal Motions in U.S. Law. The Legalities Of Hate Speech. Legalities Of Bitcoin And Other Cryptocurrency.
Explanation:
Answer:
Correct answer is (B) Equilibrium price to rise, but equilibrium quantity to be indeterminate from the information given.
Explanation:
Due to the numerous health benefits from eating bananas as stated by the U.S. Surgeon, there will be an increase in demand for banana which will make the demand curve to shift to the right making the equilibrium price to rise. For the supply curve, it will be noted that information given does not really stated whether the supply of banana increases or decreases, hence, the quality is indeterminate.
