Answer:
The correct response is Option B: infantilization.
Explanation:
Infantilization occurs when someone treats an adult as if they were a child. An example of this kind of behavior is when parents treat their young adult children as if they cannot make their own decisions or when adult children treat their elderly parents and grandparents as if they are unable to have autonomy or to take care of themselves and make their own decisions. Infantilization is a problem because it can feel demeaning to the other party, and it can affect the independence and competence of young adult children for example. It also goes against the basic rights of the elderly and it can be problematic if adult children try to manipulate power and autonomy from their elders in terms of financial decisions, for example. It can leave the elderly vulnerable to unscrupulous family members who try to take control of their resources.
Answer:
the 15th Amendment denied states the right not let men of race, color vote. Women didn't get the right to vote till the 19th Amendment
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: <span>people take unnecessary risks when they are more afraid of being called cowards than of behind injured.
This perception come from people's need to maintain their value/position at the social group. Often time, this perception is actually not true because most of the time people could if other people choose to step back and re-think their approach for a problem</span>
The correct answer is: "FICA".
FICA stands for Federal Insurance Contributions Act. It establishes a mechanism through which both employers and employees make their contributions and fund the Social Security system and the provision of Medicare benefits.
Such funding is used at a federal level to provide income support to individuals who are retired, who suffer disabilities or, for example, to the families (children) of deceased workers.
<u>The consequences of life tenure for federal judges:</u>
- Life tenure for federal judges was implemented for an extraordinarily vital purpose.
- It protects the judges from the 'political stress' which might come with periodic liability to an 'electorate'.
- But importantly, this ideal does not demand life tenure. Appointment without possibility of renewal for a fixed term of years would fulfill the same purpose.
- But ironically this life tenure has further magnified political divisions.
- So, this has failed to completely implement the judicial independence that the lifetime appointment of a federal judge had hoped to serve.
