1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
s344n2d4d5 [400]
3 years ago
12

History is more important for individuals than it is for groups. Please select the best answer from the choices provided T F

History
2 answers:
Elanso [62]3 years ago
5 0

Honestly, it would be True. Because if everyone learned history, then the whole group would know history.

Hope this helps! :)

IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is false.

It is false that History is more important for individuals than it is for groups.

Indeed, history is important for both, individuals and groups that are part of society. History teaches us what happened in the past. The good things and the bad things. These lessons must serve present-day individuals, groups, governments, and institutions to not repeat the mistakes of the past in order to have a better future.

You might be interested in
Which of the following was part of the Contract with America?
VARVARA [1.3K]
It promised to implement major reform of the federal government.
4 0
4 years ago
Over time the average rate of return on stocks
ozzi

The stock market has historically returned an average of 10% annually, before inflation. However, stock market returns vary greatly from year-to-year, and rarely fall into that average. Over nearly the last century, the stock market's average annual return is about 10%.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the United States' greatest concern about its former ally, the Soviet Union?
vitfil [10]
That they would take control of the world
7 0
3 years ago
Ang kontinenteng itinuturing na kakambal ng hilagang amerika​
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

Pls explain for better understanding

3 0
3 years ago
National Security: the colonized island country has deepwater ports for refueling the mother country's navy and merchant marine.
kolbaska11 [484]

Answer:

Imperialism is never justified.

Explanation:

In the question above we see that there is a country that has deep water ports and an airfield. These two factors are elements that generate wealth for that country and that belongs to the national territory. In this case, it is not justified that another country, out of greed, uses its influence and strength to dominate these elements through imperialism, exploiting foreign wealth for its own growth, while the country that owns that wealth is devalued.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • List Four specific rights the king promised in the Magna Carta
    9·1 answer
  • Part 1: Complete Native American Impact Chart
    6·2 answers
  • Florida world history topic 2
    12·1 answer
  • How is trade connected to the spread of culture and ideas between Egypt and Nubia
    9·1 answer
  • In addition to being field-workers and domestic workers, plantation slaves also served as
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following nations have nuclear capabilities? Select all that apply. Japan France Pakistan Canada Great Britain Aust
    10·2 answers
  • The root word mit means "send." What prefix can you add to create a word meaning "to send across"? (5 points) Inter Over Semi Tr
    8·2 answers
  • What innovation did Eli Whitney come up which helped the
    14·2 answers
  • What economic system puts individual people and companies in charge of making economic choices?
    9·1 answer
  • Who discovered terracotta soldiers​
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!