1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
3 years ago
15

at was the original purpose for the European partitioning of Middle Eastern lands? A. European countries were trying to gain as

much land as possible to become super powers in the world. B. European countries were going to mentor the Middle Eastern countries and guide them toward independence. C. Because Middle Eastern countries were constantly engaged in internal conflicts, European countries decided to step in and fix the problems. D. Because the United States was interested in dominating the Middle East, European countries decided to partition the land to prevent an American invasion
Social Studies
2 answers:
LiRa [457]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

A

Explanation:

katovenus [111]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A. European countries were trying to gain as much land as possible to become super powers in the world.

Explanation:

Considering the geopolitics of that time, the Britain, France and the USSR (now Russia) wanted to spread their power and authority as much as they can so that they can become a major super powers. This was also important as they wanted to counter the looming threat of powerful Germany and the danger of loosing Middle East to Germany. The decision to invade Middle Eastern lands was taken before the WWI and the target was the Ottoman Empire. The Sykes-Picot Agreement signed between the Britain, France and the USSR in 1916 is an example of that. As soon as the Ottoman decided to form a defensive alliance with Germany, this became an urgent matter. Hence, European countries were trying to gain as much land as possible to become super powers in the world.

You might be interested in
Why is a high quality bond typically considered a lower risk investment than a stock?
frosja888 [35]

high quality bond typically considered a lower risk investment than a stock because it usually has a higher probability rate of returning.

Meanwhile, stock price usually unpredictable and heavily reliant on the market's condition.

Explanation:

There is a risk associated with having a stock, and many unexplained variables. The value of the stock could plummet, putting your principal property at risk. There is no guarantee of return on the property, and even well-established companies have had to cut profits during difficult times.

In the case of bonds, you are assured by the bond issuer that your principal and the agreed-upon share will be paid at a specified time

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In this type of government, one person has control over all gevernment branches: autocracy, aristocracy, democracy
den301095 [7]
UK or Some Were In that area because the queen is the main on incharge unlike America
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two countries make up the korean peninsula?
Zinaida [17]
China and russia

japan

7 0
3 years ago
The United States spent over $1 million and a lot of time helping Japan after World War ll. Based on what you've learned, why do
Gemiola [76]

<u>Answer: </u>

The United States spent over $1 million and a lot of time helping Japan after World War ll because the wanted to cease the country from falling prey to communism and did not want it to come under the influence of Soviet Russia.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • After World War II was over, Japan was left devastated owing to the bombings done by the United States.
  • Though the United States was responsible for the devastation of Japan, it took up the responsibility to rebuild it because the US feared that Soviet Russia would dominate already weakened Japan and bring it under its influence.
  • The US believed that Japan would become another large hub for communism like Soviet Russia was.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following criteria makes someone eligible to run for president of United States
erica [24]
To be president, one must:
1. Be at least 35 years old.
2. Be a natural born citizen of the United States.
3. Been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help do not waste answers
    14·1 answer
  • The United States can best be described as a A. totalitarian dictatorship. B. direct democracy. C. representative democracy. D.
    6·1 answer
  • When it comes to relationships, we expect to share thoughts, feelings, and ideas in a mutual exchange called ________?
    6·1 answer
  • When a new memory interferes with an old memory, _____ is said to have occurred?
    5·1 answer
  • Explain what the common good represents in a constitutional democracy.
    14·1 answer
  • The people are the ultimate source of government power in.
    12·2 answers
  • What is known of light of asia​
    11·1 answer
  • How How were American borders expanded and what were the political social and economic reasons for doing so ​
    6·1 answer
  • An immigrant couple has a child in a country where both
    12·2 answers
  • Alexander was “Great” because:......
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!