All right.
Differences with the Historical Model:
1. That model shows the planet's orbits as perfect circles, not ellipses.
<span>2. Aristotle believed in a geocentric (Earth centered) solar system, while it actually is heliocentric Sun centered). </span>
<span>3. That model didn't show all the planets we know today, such as Neptune, Uranus, etc. </span>
<span>4. A lot of that model was based on religious beliefs.
</span>Differences with Modern Model:
1. Our model shows the orbits as ellipses.
<span>2. Our model shows a heliocentric solar system. </span>
<span>3. Our model shows all the planets we know today. </span>
<span>4. Our model has nothing to do with religion.
</span>Similarities Between Both Models:
1. They both are based on the same solar system.
<span>2. They both show the inner planets, the Moon, the Sun, Jupiter, and Saturn. </span>
<span>3. The both were made by many observations of the sky.
</span>
Hope this helps.:b
It all depends on the trait. If the dominant is more common that the recessive trait then it is more likely to a dominant trait in the gene pool. But if the recessive trait is more common in the gene pool then you will have a recessive trait. Does this make sense? Let me know if I'm right!
If thousands of glucose molecules were bonded together with equal numbers of sucrose molecules, the resulting substance could be described as a polysaccharide. They are <span>polymeric carbohydrate molecules composed of long chains of monosaccharide units bound together by glycosidic linkages.</span>
