1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Svetradugi [14.3K]
3 years ago
11

What happened in the electoral college system after the election of 1800?

History
2 answers:
Novosadov [1.4K]3 years ago
7 0
It is D more important
kaheart [24]3 years ago
7 0
D <span>Political parties became more important.
i took the test</span>
You might be interested in
Identify two reasons for the Indian partition.
iren [92.7K]
1. Congress leadership: Nehru and Gandhi underestimated Jinnah, Muslim League, its ambitions and outreach. In the 1920s, Gandhi neglected Jinnah and appealed to Muslims for a common cause, which seemed harmless at that time.In the 1930s, Nehru, assured of the backing of his socialist ideology and the support among the Muslim bases for the same, arrogantly believed that Muslims won't be moved by a party based on faith. It later turned out he was false.In the 1930s, Jinnah was willing to negotiate an agreement with the leadership, but was constantly ignored. This is going over my head. Arrogance and underestimation of someone doesn't go unpunished. However blame is to be equally shared by all the top leaders. In the 1940s, ML with almost a million members had no compulsion to bow out. He had no reason to cut a deal now. He was demanding recklessly. He refused to allow first independence , then partition. I may not comment on the course of history had this been allowed.While Gandhi tried his best possible to stop the painful separation, Nehru wasn't ready to the idea of Jinnah being the first Prime Minister of the independent India till the very end. Patel hoped partition would show Jinnah the fault in his ideas and would seal his fate. Thus the failure of Congress leadership and the rise of Jinnah is interlinked.
2. Jinnah and the Muslim League: He instigated religious passions and fears among the masses since the 30s.He was more concerned with the fact that Muslims and Hindus didn't intermarry or interdine and that Congress didn't have Muslim representatives in the 1946 Provincial Elections. He claimed in his 1940 Muslim League Presidential Address that cultures, literature and way of living and views on life were different of the two communities. The theory of one nation had been carried along too far and that it was nothing but a far fetched dream. I don't think partition gave too much peace either.The provinvcial elections were held on the lines of religion and demand for a new country, rather than on the promises of growth and "independence".Direct Action Day was a call by this great leader. What else do you expect from such a gathering at such a crucial point of time on such a critical issue. If countries could be made by gatherings and processions, I'm going out on the streets to demand the Shubham Kingdom! The violence, retaliation and counter violence led to the inevitable- Partition of two brothers, fighting for petty issues, not ready to listen and even the parents acting as stubborn kids.
4 0
3 years ago
"Truman realized that he could never get the economy-minded Republicans -- and the public that stood by them -- to shell out tax
Ira Lisetskai [31]
I don’t know because I like to eat dog
5 0
3 years ago
What role did president truman play in the vietnam war apush?
Lisa [10]
He supported French colonialism in Vietnam to stop communism. 
5 0
3 years ago
How did the entry of the United States into World War I influence the conflict?
madam [21]

Answer:

It helped Allies stop a German offensive and support a counteroffensive that led to Germany's defeat.

Explanation:

I'm not entirely sure of the answer, but through the process of elimination I've made my way here. I know it's not the first one, because although we had a poorly trained military, we were not short on supplies.

I know it's not the third one, because obviously the United States entering the war had an effect on it. Even though there was a German blockade we most likely could've gotten through it.

It's probably not four because saying that the United States entering the war immediately caused the capture of Berlin is a bit extreme- all though the United States entering the war caused it to end quickly, it was still around a year.

8 0
2 years ago
!!! NEED HELP ASAP !!!
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

2

Explanation:

Bec I just know trust me.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did and to what extent were european monarchs establishing absolute power and authority?
    13·1 answer
  • How is a cryptid a modern day animal legend?
    12·2 answers
  • Rules of behavior known as the Ten Commandments were derived from what tradition
    15·1 answer
  • What was one result of the breakup of the Soviet Union?
    15·2 answers
  • During the 1950s, television A. effectively spread images of working-class life to a growing number of Americans. B. tried to re
    13·1 answer
  • Indian merchants often served as middlemen between traders from the west and those from
    5·1 answer
  • Eleventh Amendment immunity may be abrogated by Congress under which of these powers:
    7·2 answers
  • BRAINIEST ANSWER :))) please help!
    9·2 answers
  • The area highlighted on the map above shows the area of the United States most affected by what disaster in the 1930s?
    7·2 answers
  • 6 causes of the economic depression
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!