Answer:
a. $45 billion.
Explanation:
The aggregate expenditures must have fallen by = 0.75*$65 billion
= $45 billion
Therefore, The aggregate expenditures must have fallen by $45 billion.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
But before that the depreciation expense per year is
Depreciation per year = (Cost - Residual value) ÷ Useful life
= ($38,080 - $2,800) ÷ 6 years
= $5,880
1.Net book value as on disposal date is
= $38,080 - ($5,880 × 3)
= $20,440
2.
We know that
Gain on sales = (Sales - Book value)
Gain = $(20,400 - 20,400) = 0
a. Loss = $13,000 - $20,440 = -$7,440
b. Loss = $10,000 - $20,440 = -$10,440
Answer:
the principal amount at a rate of 4% is 2000
principal amount at a rate of 3.5% is 4000-2000 =2000
Explanation:
We have given total amount borrowed = $4000
Let x amount is borrowed at a rate of 4%
So $4000-x is borrowed at rate of 3.5%
Total interest = $150
We know that simple interest ![=\frac{principal\ amount\times rate\times time}{100}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5Cfrac%7Bprincipal%5C%20amount%5Ctimes%20rate%5Ctimes%20time%7D%7B100%7D)
So ![\frac{x\times 4\times 1}{100}+\frac{(4000-x)\times 3.5\times 1}{100}=150](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7Bx%5Ctimes%204%5Ctimes%201%7D%7B100%7D%2B%5Cfrac%7B%284000-x%29%5Ctimes%203.5%5Ctimes%201%7D%7B100%7D%3D150)
![4x+14000-3.5x=15000](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=4x%2B14000-3.5x%3D15000)
0.5 x=1000
x = 2000
So the principal amount at a rate of 4% is 2000
And principal amount at a rate of 3.5% is 4000-2000 =2000
Answer:
True
Explanation:
An activity based costing (ABC) system assigns resources to the different production activities, and then unit costs are determined by the proportion of the production activities that every unit requires.
This is a much more complex costing method than just assigning overhead costs based on direct labor hours or machine hours.
Answer:
A. He has made several significant contributions to the areas of organizational learning and change.
Explanation:
<em>Option B</em>: Peter Drucker was the first person to discuss MBO, not Peter Senge. So, this option is incorrect.
<em>Option C</em>: It is the function of management. Therefore, Peter Senge might contribute to this one, but there is no evidence. So, it is wrong.
<em>Option D</em>: Peter Senge advocated the scientific methods of management, but not for the determination of efficient production.
<em>Option E</em>: He does not contend with the bureaucratic structure. Therefore, it is wrong, either.
<em>Option A</em>: It is the answer because he has made several contributions to the areas of organizational learning through the establishment of the society of organizational learning.