Answer:
Interest expense and a realized gain.
Explanation:
Given:
Crawford Inc. has bonds outstanding during a year in which the general (risk-free) rate of interest has risen. Crawford elected the fair value option for the bonds upon issuance.
Solution:
The company will report Interest expense and a realized gain for the bonds in its income statement for the year.
Answer:
Option B "functional strategy
" is the correct option.
Explanation:
- A functional approach or strategy is necessarily connected to operations and maintenance-level decision-making, also recognized as tactical changes.
- Those same tactical decisions were mostly applied to different operational departments such as business, research as well as development, human resources, warehousing, logistic support, amongst others.
And therefore this strategy demonstrates best the specific situation.
Answer:
As with all probability sampling methods, simple random sampling allows the sampling error to be calculated and reduces selection bias. A specific advantage is that it is the most straightforward method of probability sampling.
Question Completion with options:
a. Past performance information provided directly by the offeror should not be relied upon.
b. The past performance evaluation satisfies the responsibility determination required under FAR subpart 9.1.
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
d. Offerors with demonstrated past performance that is neither relevant nor recent must not be removed from further consideration for award.
Answer:
The statement that is true regarding the evaluation of the past performance is:
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
Explanation:
It has been established that past performance is the best indicator of future performance. Past performance can predict future performance, behavior, and success. Organizations that achieve some good performance in the past build the required confidence, which will help them to forge ahead in the present and future. This is why in selecting companies for a negotiated competitive services acquisition, even the past performance of predecessor companies should be reviewed to get a better handle on the company's ability to deliver on the projects.
I'm sorry but I don't know the answer.
I think Google would help you!
