Hello.
Cancer is an illness that has been around for years and years, but seems to just have gotten worse. The word cancer actually came from a Greek words karkinos to describe carcinoma tumors by a physician Hippocrates (460–370 B.C), but even he was not the first to discover this disease. And this is kind of where we see the origin of the sickness, which is quite some time or people to have already cracked this “code”.
I hope this completely answers your question. I’m always happy to help.
~Brooke❤️
Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
Socially, this period isn't a mediator time between the prosperous Great and Magnificent ones, as it was depicted previously. Aristotle the dad of current sciences, Menander the incredible comedies' creator, Epicure the moralist, Eratosthenes, yet additionally Euclid, Archimedes, and Polybius lived and worked amid the Greek Time frame. This period indicated advance in design, a ton of incredible euergetism (charitable donattions to the network), a duplication of gala days and festivities (appeared by the extraordinary number of made theaters), the improvement of workmanship and the making of libraries, with the most renowned being in Alexandria.
Efforts to restore Catholicism gained momentum
