Answer:
8.01
Step-by-step explanation:
i used a calc look it up
Answer:
No I do not agree with Andre says that 3 divided by 2/3 Solving for 3 ÷ 2/3
3 ÷ 2/3
= 3 × 3/2
= 9/2
= 4 1/2
Therefore, 3 divided by 2/3 is 4 1/2
Andre's reasoning is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
It is incorrect
Let's divide and compare the sum
3 : 2/3 = 3*3/2 = 9/2 = 4 1/2
and
There are four 2/3 fractions and one 1/3 fraction
The 1/3 fraction is 1/2 of 2/3 fraction so instead of counting 1/3 as 1/3 it should be counted as 1/2
The slope of this line is 4/5
A) let the number of cameras sold per day for breakeven be x
Total daily cost = 2000 + 9x
Total daily revenue = 17x
therefore for just covering expenses both cost and revenue must be equal
2000 + 9x = 17x
2000 = 17x - 9x = 8x
x = 2000/8 = 250 cameras
b) increasing production by 50 cameras per day will give a daily profit of;
50 * (17 - 9) = 50 * 8 = $400 (seeing that the fixed daily cost of $2000 remains unchanged)
It's a
<span>(-9x</span>²<span>-7x+2)(-4x-2)
36x</span>³+18x²+28x²+14x-8x-4
36x³+46x²+6x-4
