1). The caste or group that made up the largest proportion of the population was considered to be "the general category".
2). The castes or groups that made up the smallest proportion were considered to be from disadvantaged backgrounds and underrepresented in India. In modern times, they would refer to the Dalits, an official term used for those experiencing discrimination or untouchability. While percentage-wise they may have been a minority, they have still faced persecution and marginalization throughout history. It is believed that this contributed to their lack of representation during the pre-independence period as well as their continued disadvantages today.
3). Casteism has a long history in South Asia where there is evidence indicating its existence since BCE periods (Before Common Era). It has been present in Indian society for thousands of years and has greatly influenced the politics, economics and social structures throughout their history. However, for many years this was not an issue that concerned the public or the government as it was normalized. Thus, during pre-independence times casteism continued to be practiced with little change in modern India.
One major difference was A: The Byzantine government clearly placed the emperor as the highest religious authority, while the Roman government kept political and religious authority more separate.
<h3>How did the Byzantines differ from the western Romans?</h3>
The Western Romans had the Pope as the head of the church and the emperor as the head of the empire thereby keeping both offices separate.
The Byzantines on the other hand, had their emperor as both the head of the empire, and the head of the church.
Find out more on the Byzantine empire at brainly.com/question/1446842
#SPJ1
Answer:
Franklin D. Roosevelt
He served as governor from 1929 to 1933, promoting programs to combat the economic crisis besetting the United States. In the 1932 presidential election, Roosevelt defeated Republican President Herbert Hoover in a landslide.
Explanation:
PRINCIPLE OF EXCLUSION
One of the cornerstones of the constitutional protections of the USA. UU It is the principle of exclusion. The principle of exclusion establishes that evidence obtained as a result of an illegal entry and search or a legal interrogation is not admissible against the victim in criminal proceedings. There are several fundamentals behind the principle, including: 1) Deterrence of law enforcement officers from engaging in prohibited behaviors since valuable evidence will be lost if such conduct continues; and 2) preservation of the judicial integrity through the prevention of corruption in the court for police conduct outside the law.
