1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vikentia [17]
3 years ago
15

How and why is the government justifying the separation of families?

History
1 answer:
Taya2010 [7]3 years ago
6 0

BECAUSE THEY ARE STUPID DEVILS!!

You might be interested in
What was a consequence of Julius Caesar’s assassination?
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer:

It's D

Explanation:

a more powerful government without a dictator

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1987, the United States and its allies defeated who?
Rufina [12.5K]
It’s C: Japan
Because Japan and USA had a relationship between each other. And the relationship began at late 18th and early 19th ;b
3 0
2 years ago
What symbols on a coat of arms means warrior or one who stands up for what they believe in? 20 pts.
sertanlavr [38]

Answer:

I think that it's Allerion.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
How did the Aryans and Indians justify the use of the caste system?​
ioda

Answer:  1,000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Do you think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it? Why or why not?
Vlada [557]
This is a matter of opinion.  Do YOU think the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was worth it?  Let's look at the factors.

What were some of the positives?  Well, firstly, it ended World War II.  That's kind of a big deal.  In fact, it caused Japan not only to surrender, but UNCONDITIONALLY surrender.  Basically, that means the US could ask Japan to do whatever it liked--which the US liked!  Secondly, it was a triumph of science.  The atomic bomb was a revolutionary work of science.  Nothing like it had ever been made before, and it was all based on secrecy and theoretical science.  The atomic bomb also <span>provided the basis for new, improved weapons, including the hydrogen bomb.  </span>Thirdly, it helped establish the United States as a world power.  Knowing about this super powerful weapon the US had, countries were likely to back off!  

But there's a lot of negatives here, too.  Keep in mind that most of these benefits were for the United States alone.  Of course, there was one other BIG negative for the United States, and that's cost.  The atomic bomb was worth billions of dollars!  A second big one wasn't so much for the United States as for the world, especially Japan.  When the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the effects on the people and city were devastating.  People were vaporized.  Cities and buildings were flattened, and nothing is left but carnage.  People died, their skin peeling off, from cancer and radiation.  It was awful!  Thirdly, it caused the arms race.  Knowing the US had this super weapon, ALL the countries started building their own.  Now, we pretty much live in fear of all the nuclear weapons there are today--which are hundreds of times more powerful each than the first bomb!

So what do you think?  Was it worth it?
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What type of government dominated the first civilizations, which has one person in control and has complete authority over the c
    15·1 answer
  • What part the marshall plan played in worsening relations between the USA and the Ussr
    12·1 answer
  • Ethiopia was, and still is, predominantly what religion due to the conversion and influence of King Ezana?
    11·1 answer
  • The Third Amendment to the Constitution would be violated if
    8·1 answer
  • Why were the cities in the North so much larger than the<br> cities in the South?
    5·2 answers
  • The two parts of the legislative branch of the Texas government are ________ and ________.
    8·1 answer
  • Why did the writers of the Constitution likely put rules in place that require the
    13·1 answer
  • What did Hitler learn from the response of other countries and the League of Nations which helped him in the future?
    13·1 answer
  • What laws did Jefferson refer to when he listed the complaints against the british king
    8·2 answers
  • Which is NOT a characteristic of an oral tradition?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!