1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pshichka [43]
4 years ago
12

Assume General Electric Company agreed in May 2016 to construct a nuclear generator for NSTAR, a utility company serving the Bos

ton area. The contract price of $750 million is to be paid as follows: $250 million at the time of signing; $250 million on December 31, 2016; and $250 million at completion in May 2017. General Electric incurred the following costs in constructing the generator: $240 million in 2016 and $360 million in 2017.
a. Compute the amount of General Electric's revenue, expense, and income for both 2016 and 2017, and for both years combined, under the cost-to-cost revenue recognition method.
Enter dollar amounts in millions.
Business
1 answer:
aalyn [17]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

2016: $300 million; 40%; $60 million

2017: $450 million; 60%; $90 million

Explanation:

Total costs:

= Costs incurred in 2016 + Costs incurred in 2017

= $240 + $360

= $600

In 2016:

Percent of total excepted costs:

= Costs incurred in 2016 ÷ Total costs

= $240 ÷ $600

= 0.4 or 40%

Revenue recognized:

= Percent of total excepted cost × Contract price

= 0.4 × $750 million

= $300 million

Income = Revenue recognized - Costs incurred in 2016

             = $300 million - $240 million

             = $60 million

In 2017:

Percent of total excepted costs:

= Costs incurred in 2017 ÷ Total costs

= $360 ÷ $600

= 0.6 or 60%

Revenue recognized:

= Percent of total excepted cost × Contract price

= 0.6 × $750 million

= $450 million

Income = Revenue recognized - Costs incurred in 2017

             = $450 million - $360 million

             = $90 million

You might be interested in
Flo is working on a construction site when she is injured on the job in the collapse of a girder company-made beam. at the time,
Bumek [7]
Injuries during working hours at a construction site leads to several legal consequences. If a person gets injured at working site, he/she can file civil law suit for negligence or product liability.
In the above situation, Flo was not wearing any safety wear while working on the construction site of a Grider company. She can file a product liability suit against the Girder company.
The company can most successfully raise the defense of "negligence". Since Flo was not wearing any safety wear during her working hours, the company can raise the defense of negligence because she knew that working on construction site without wearing safety gears may cause harm to her.
4 0
3 years ago
Students have the right to express themselves through speech provided the speech is not obscene, vulgar, or disruptive.
mezya [45]
This statement is true
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the absence of government regulation or private negotiation, firms will pollute less than the economically optimal amount.
juin [17]
Wrong in absence of gov. there will be no laws to abide so essentially they can do as they please.<span />
7 0
3 years ago
The market for corn in Brazil has a large number of sellers and there is no difference in the products sold by each seller. As t
LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

Option (b) is correct.

Explanation:

In a market condition of pure competition, there are large number of buyers and sellers of the product. The sellers in this market condition are behaving like a price taker.

If a single firm wants to increase the price of the product then as a result the demand for their product is reduced or become zero.

There are some characterstics of the firms under pure competition market condition:

(i) They are selling homogeneous products.

(ii) Price taker firms

(iii) Large no. of buyers and sellers

 

8 0
3 years ago
On January 3, 2014, Trusty Delivery Service purchased a truck at a cost of $90,000. Before placing the truck in service, Trusty
likoan [24]

Answer:

Accumulated depreciation for Years 1 - 5 under:

  • the Straight-line method is $90,000.
  • the Units-of-production method is $90,000.
  • the Double-declining-balance method is $86,170.

Explanation:

The total cost of the asset is $90,000 + $3,000 + $1,500 + $4,500 = $99,000, since all the other costs were directly attributable cost and were necessary to bring the asset to usable form.

  • The painting is capitalized because it is the first time Trust Delivery would be using the asset, otherwise it would have been expended
  • Overhauling cost can be regarded as a separate asset, if we were provided with different useful lives - componentization.

Under straight-line method, depreciation expense is (cost - residual value) / No of years = ($99,000 - $9,000) / 5 years = $18,000 yearly depreciation expense.

Accumulated depreciation for Years 1 to 5 is $18,000 x 5 years $90,000.

The unit-of-production method is used when the asset value closely relates to the units of output it is able to produce. It is expressed with the formula below:

(Original Cost - Salvage value) / Estimated production capacity x Units/year

At Year 1, depreciation expense (DE) is: ($99,000 - $9,000) / 100,000 miles x 22,500 miles = $20,250/year

Accumulated depreciation for the first four years is $20,250 x 4 years = $81,000.

At Year 5, depreciation = $90,000 / 100,000 miles x 10,000 miles = $9,000

Note that this depreciation method results in higher depreciation charge when the asset is heavily used, at this time, it was in Years 1 - 4.

Accumulated depreciation expense for Years 1 to 5, under this method, is $90,000 (addition of first four years and the Year 5).

The double-declining method is otherwise known as the reducing balance method and is given by the formula below:

Double declining method = 2 X SLDP X BV

SLDP = straight-line depreciation percentage

BV = Book value

SLDP is 100%/5years = 20%, then 20% multiplied by 2 to give 40%

At Year 1, 40% X $99,000 = $39,600

At Year 2, 40% X $59,400 ($99,000 - $39,600) = $23,760

At Year 3, 40% X $35,640 ($59,400 - $23,760) = $14,256

At Year 4, 40% X $21,384 ($35,640 - $14,256) = $8,554 approximately (the depreciation expense would stop at this stage since the amount falls below the residual value).

Accumulated depreciation expense for Years 1 to 4, under this method, is $86,170 (addition of all the yearly depreciation).

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Scenario 1: Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) allow people to shelter some of their income from taxation. Suppose the maximu
    8·1 answer
  • Opportunity costs occur when decisions are made. economists recommend that those decisions be based on what?
    5·1 answer
  • Advise florence and her team on how they can convince the staff using john kotters theory to lead change
    10·1 answer
  • As the price level falls, the cost of borrowing money will______causing the quantity of output demanded_______. This phenomenon
    6·1 answer
  • The opportunity cost of earning an advanced collage degree is that
    8·1 answer
  • The local grocery store expects that customers will use credit cards to pay for a total of 30 comma 000 sales transactions durin
    6·1 answer
  • If a cost estimate indicates that a residential design is significantly over budget, what changes would you consider to reduce t
    9·1 answer
  • Projects with different lives: You are trying to choose between purchasing one of two machines for a factory. Machine A costs $1
    15·1 answer
  • At the end of the year, the deferred tax asset account had a balance of $12.8 million attributable to a cumulative temporary dif
    5·1 answer
  • 16) The Nantucket Nugget is unlevered and is valued at $640,000. Nantucket is currently deciding whether including debt in its c
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!