Answer:
The explanation is given below:
Explanation:
According to this situation it can be defined as
Pursuant to U.C.C. § 3-203, transfer of instrument is when an instrument is delivered by a person other than an issuer for the purpose of giving to a receiver the right to enforce the instrument. The transfer vests in a transferee the transferor's right to enforce the instrument. The rights include the right as a holder in due course. However, the transferee cannot acquire rights of a holder in due course by a transfer, directly or indirectly, from a holder in due course if the transferee engaged in fraud or illegality affecting the instrument. When an instrument is transferred for value , a transferee does not become a holder because of lack of indorsement. Moreover, when a transferor purports to transfer less than the entire instrument, the negotiation of the instrument does not occur.
The best response of Fannie mae’s to this argument is because Becky Smith signed a note and she cannot own that property as the note was in country home loans name and he defaulted payment under that law.
Answer:
$6,000
Explanation:
Since the main the activitity of Carlos' business is dry cleaning services, but not a trade in or business in holding real property, he is only is at risk for $30,000 which is personal money
Therefore, the total of $24,000 will be deducted in the first year while the remaining $6,000 will be deducted in the second year to have a total of $30,000 which is his personal risk.
Therefore, for the second year, Carlos can deduct <u>$6,000</u> of the loss.
Yes, its is the only thing marketing mix does.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in a microsoft excel document. Last version.
Explanation
Please consider the data provided by the exercise. If you have any question please write me back. All the exercises are solved in a single sheet with the formulas indications.
Answer:
See explanation section
Explanation:
See the images to get the answer
