Totalitarian government is very controlling
Answer:
lado muji kati lamo question hi harr
Answer: American revolution is in fact a building of a totally new society, on a new continent. That is the most essencial difference in comparison to French and Russian revolution. Of course everythings takes place within British ideological and political context, but colonies are in a new continent and very distant from London. French revolution is (at the very beginning) an attempt to transform already existing society, i.e. attempt to transform absolute monarchy in constitutional monarchy. Course of events leads to Terror and proclamation of republic and then to Empire. Most of these things were not intended and originally people wanted (inspired by the British constitutional model) constitutional monarchy. Russian revolution is inspired by Marxism and especially by its prophetic aspect (so-called historical law of inevitable arrival of Communism)
Explanation: American revolution wanted to create a society with kings, i.e. republican system. This is exactly what happened. French revolution intended to be a change for constitutional monarchy ...events took a bit different course. Russians acted on prophecy, they wanted a perfect Communist society without inequality but the result was totalitarian regime.
Answer:
A. the French
Explanation:
This situation occurred during the French and Indian war. The fought actually occurred between France and Great Britain, but both sides were supported by some Native American tribes.
The cause of the fight was an issue when determining the owners of upper Ohio River valley. The French argued that the part of the river was belonged to them because controlling that part of the river will opened up a path for trades to Virginia and Pennsylvania, Gaining this will resulted in great economic benefits for whoever own that part of the river.
Answer:
The inherent conflict between capitalist and communist economic policies, markets, and trade
Explanation:
Explained in passage, "During World War II, the Communist Party of the Soviet Union partially abandoned an approach to international relations which presupposed the inevitability of a clash between communism and capitalism. "
