Absolute chaos is what we would define as anarchy; it is essentially the reverse of order. What makes an anarchy worse would be the shocking lack of a robust legal system because there can be no laws in a society built on complete chaos, but if you're talking about a government based on anarchy, it would be a system where there is no state identity and no real central government. Somalia, to some extent, serves as the most prevalent illustration of why a government founded on anarchy is a horrible concept. Although there is a central government, its power over its territory varies. Certain sections are under the influence of the militant group Al Shabab, and the Somaliland region is attempting to declare its independence from the federal government. The country is rife with a milder but no less deadly type of anarchy due to the absence of a strong central leadership.
Anarchic societies where every individual is equally empowered are unsustainable. The individuals quickly cluster into tribal units, and without some overriding authority, it’s impossible to stop that from happening. The tribal units (or gangs, if you prefer) are run by warlords who keep each other in check until one of them gains a decisive advantage over the others, and then you’ve got the beginnings of a state.
This drama has played out countless times in the course of human history, and is still playing out in the criminal underworld to the extent that it can. That extent is limited by the fact that now there is an overriding authority with enforceable power, the legitimate state.
Thank you,
Eddie
D. It was the first program to send a human to the moon. Project Gemini was chartered by President John F. Kennedy and NASA's second program in human spaceflight program. Project Gemini's goal is to make space travel techniques for the Apollo mission that would later begin.
Answer:
some key factors are economic interests, cultural values, the power of the federal government to control the states, and slavery. Hope this helped, please mark brainliest:)
Explanation:
Answer:
Kawalan ng kakayahan ng gobyerno.
Paliwanag:
Pananagutan ng gobyerno ang napakaraming kaso ng pang-aabuso sa mga kababaihan sa Pilipinas dahil nabigo ang gobyerno na magpataw ng mga batas at magbigay ng mga parusa sa mga indibidwal na gumawa ng pang-aabuso sa kababaihan. Kung nagsimula ang gobyerno na magbigay ng mga parusa sa isang tao sa publiko na nang-aabuso sa mga kababaihan, mayroong isang mataas na pagbawas na nangyayari sa mga kaso ng pang-aabuso sa kababaihan sa Pilipinas.
<span>The answer is 'Iraq denounced the events and disassociated itself from al-Qaeda'. Saddam Hussein, who was then-leader of Iraq, blamed past American actions for the events, although the country later expressed sympathy with the victims of the attack. The link between Hussein's Iraq government and al-Qaeda is controversial; George W. Bush used this partly as justification for the Iraq war. </span>
