Answer:
They help by:
Explanation:
Automated haul trucks and drilling machines are being tested in mines across the world. Sensors at the tip of drill bits are measuring ore grade in real time, and data analytics is being used to discover new deposits of precious metals. In oil and gas, underwater robots fix gas pipelines off the coast and drones inspect offshore oil rigs. Crawling well-drilling machines drill multiple wells quickly and accurately one after another. These are just some of the many ways technology is transforming the demand and supply of resources.
That really depends as politics were constantly changing through the course of history. If you're referring to the time around the constitution, then the main political parties would be the Federalists and the Anti Federalists in which the Federalists were in favor of a strong central government while the anti Federalists scorned the idea in fear of a repeat of their much hated former king.
Answer:
Lev Vladimirovich Kuleshov.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the individual that is being described in this scenario is known as Lev Vladimirovich Kuleshov. He was a Russian and Soviet filmmaker and theorist born in Tambov, Russia on January 13, 1899. Kuleshov is known for The Kuleshov effect which was created by him to show the mental phenomenon in which viewers see deeper and more emotional meaning in a two sequential shots than from a single shot in isolation when making a movie.
According to the research studies, the correlation between high intelligence and leadership is "<u>moderate; having a leader who is smarter, but not too smart, works best."</u>
This is because the research studies conducted revealed that leaders with a higher IQ to 120 have positive outcomes when it comes to leadership effectiveness.
However, from the IQ of 120 and above, the positive outcomes in leadership effectiveness regress gradually as the IQ of leaders increases from 120.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option C. "moderate; having a leader who is smarter, but not too smart, works best."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/7639253