Answer:
$186,700
Explanation:
The computation of adjusted cost of goods sold is shown below:-
Before that we need to do the following calculations
Raw material consumed = Beginning raw material + Raw material purchases - Ending raw materials - Raw materials included in manufacturing overhead costs as indirect materials
= $40,000 + $63,000 - $24,000 - $5,000
= $74,000
Total manufacturing cost = Beginning work in progress + Raw material consumed + Direct labor cost + Manufacturing overhead cost - Ending work in progress
= $23,000 + $74,000 + $73,700 + $48,000 - $17,000
= $201,700
Unadjusted Cost of goods sold = Raw materials + Total manufacturing cost - Ending finished goods
= $50,000 + $201,700 - $72,000
= $179,700
Adjusted COGS = Unadjusted Cost of goods sold + Underapplied overhead
= $179,700 + ($55,000 - $48,000)
= $179,700 + $7,000
= $186,700
Answer:
Risk and Return
1. Joe is an average investor. His financial advisor gave him options of investing in stock A, with a σ of 12%, and stock B, with a σ of 9%. Both stocks have the same expected return of 16%. Joe can pick only one stock and decides to invest in stock B.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
2. Marcie works for an educational technology firm that recently launched its employee stock option plan (ESOP). Marcie allocated all her investments in the ESOP.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
3. rin wants to invest in a hedge fund that has had a very strong performance track record. The hedge fund has given its investors a return of over 60% for the past five years. Although Erin is tempted to put her money in the fund, she decides to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund’s assets, because she is aware that past performance is no guarantee of future results.
Good Financial Decision?
Yes
No
Explanation:
1. Joe's decision to invest in stock B is a good financial decision. Since both investments have the same returns, the decision on which investment to take shifts to the standard deviation of the returns, which specifies the variability of the returns. Invariably, the investment with less standard deviation should win the vote. Therefore, Joe's decision is a good financial decision because investment in B has a standard deviation of 9% unlike A's 12%.
2. Putting all eggs in one market as Marcie had done by allocating all her investments in the ESOP is not a good financial decision, theoretically. It is always best to spread the risks, though higher-yielding investments (returns) bear higher risks.
3. The decision of Erin to conduct due diligence on the hedge fund's assets, despite its past performance is a good financial decision. Due diligence reveals some behind-the-scene information that are instrumental in making sound business decisions. Who are the present managers of the fund? What systems are in place in the entity to guarantee similar future performance, all things being equal? What market's sentiments and information are available for consideration? These questions, and many others can be answered through a due diligence. Surely, "past performance is no guarantee of future results."
Answer:
The correct answer is temporary/earnings
Explanation:
The objective of the accounting closing is to evaluate the benefits or losses of a business activity. In other words, if the final result is positive, there is an increase in business equity, and if the final result is negative, there is a decrease in company equity.
Finally, in the accounting closing, a series of steps are carried out: the accounting regularization, the determination of the result, the closing of accounts and the presentation of annual accounts.
In conclusion, in the accounting cycle a period of time is contemplated and a set of operations and procedures are carried out in order to reflect the financial status of a company.
Answer:
The existing state of American economy must be declared earlier respondent the interrogation.
The U.S. financial position is vigorous in 2017.The value rate is in its perfect vary i.e., 2.4 (2-3%).Joblessness is at its ordinary proportion and there isn't an excessive amount of rise or decrease. Conversely, the value is predicted to descent to a pair of 2.1% in 2018 and 2.0 in 2019. Drop in value would cause decrease in GDP and growth in state.
To avoid this drop I will be able to inscribe to manager of Federal Reserve Bank to cut back the rate (expansionary financial policy).Federal reserve will try this by shopping for bonds. Once Federal Reserve purchases bonds the money offer increases and rate decreases. As rate decreases mixture demand and financial gain increases. With escalation in financial gain and mixture demand the value wouldn't decrease in 2018 and 2019.
I would not recommend an expansionary economic policy as a result of it increases the rate yet and thus results in situation out.
Answer:
19.64%
Explanation:
The return on equity shall be determined through following mentioned formula:
Return on equity=Net profit/Equity
In the given question
Net profit=9.68%*$807,200=$78,136.96
Equity=Assets-Total Debt
=$1,105,100-64%($1,105,100)
=$397,836
Return on Equity=$78,136.96/$397,836
=19.64%
