What does riis state will happen if the slums are not wiped out

2 answers:

6 0

Riis states that if the nation does not wipe out slums, the slums will wipe out.

He see the battle against slums as a battle with poverty. He states that the battle must be won as fasts as possible, stating that the slums are the enemy of civilization.

Law Incorporation [45]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Riis stated that if the slums are not decimated, the slums will destroy all citizens.

Explanation:

Jacob August Riis was an American social documentary photographer. He investigated the scandals that capitalism provides and revealed life in the favelas of New York in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He was a great supporter of photography.

Riis at the turn of the twentieth century recorded the conditions of the people living in the slums in poor living conditions. His series entitled "How the Other Half Lives" catalyzed the social reform movement that culminated in the first housing legislation for apartment buildings, which resulted from Riis' claim that the slums should end. He claimed that if the slums were not decimated and their residents had better housing conditions, the slums would destroy us all.

You might be interested in

give reasons why India decided to adopt the policy of separation of religion and state.Is this a water tight segregation?

Bess [88]

Answer:

It’s not a water tight segregation.

Explanation:

India decided to adopt the policy of separation of religion and state in order to allow everybody in the country choose any religion they wanted to belong to. This is one of the reason why they ensured the country doesn’t have any specific religion attached to it. This helped in the prevention of any type of segregation as a result of religious differences in the country.

5 0

3 years ago

Bill clinton is a democratic true or false

belka [17]

The answer to your question is True.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

List at least four ways Ivan the Great (Ivan III) gained territory and power within Russia.

marin [14]

It will be easy about me, why do you think? As an independent sovereign Ivan lll began to behave towards the Tatars. In 1476. He refused to pay them an annual tribute and entered into an alliance with the Crimean Khan, an enemy of the Golden Horde. Standing on the Ugra (1480) put an end to the Mongol-Tatar yoke. The Russian state acquired formal sovereignty.

5 0

3 years ago

Which outcome could be considered a cost of voting?

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Comparing and Contrasting Review the notes you took throughout the lesson. Then write a paragraph that analyzes the ways Madison

Svetllana [295]

Answer:

Alexander Hamilton belonged to the Federalist Party, which supported the idea of a strong central government. He thought that the federal government should be able to keep a strong army and navy, to raise taxes, and to have good relations with Great Britain.

James Madison was on the opposite side. He was a member of the Democratic-Republican Party. This party favored a weak central government, and favored state and local power.

The biggest rift between Hamilton and Madison came when the issue of a federal bank came up in Congress. Hamilton wanted to create a Central Bank to take on the debts of the states, and to fund future programs and armies, Madison, as anti-federalist, naturally opposed this idea.

This rift was solved with the Compromise of 1790. The southerners, including James Madison, agreed to the creation of a national bank in exchange for having the new capital in southern territory (Washington D.C.).

5 0

3 years ago