The answer would be: <span>b. identify "shades of gray" when diagnosing
The dimensional approach is really crucial in this kind of diagnosis because it put the category of the disorder under a quantifiable numerical value. This opportunity could be achieved as long as the dimensional approach is linked to a categorical definition. </span>
Montgomery - Alabama
Juneau - Alaska
Phoenix - Arizona
Little Rock - Arkansas
Sacramento - California
Denver - Colorado
Hartford - Connecticut
Dover - Delaware
Tallahassee - Florida
Atlanta - Georgia
Honolulu - Hawaii
Boise - Idaho
Springfield - Illinois
Indianapolis - Indiana
Des Moines - Iowa
Topeka - Kansas
Frankfort - Kentucky
Baton Rouge - Louisiana
Augusta - Maine
Annapolis - Maryland
Boston - Massachusetts
Lansing - Michigan
Saint Paul - Minnesota
Jackson - Mississippi
Jefferson - City Missouri
Helena - Montana
Lincoln - Nebraska
Carson City - Nevada
Concord - New Hampshire
Trenton - New Jersey
Santa Fe - New Mexico
Albany - New York
Raleigh - North Carolina
Bismarck - North Dakota
Columbus - Ohio
Oklahoma City - Oklahoma
Salem - Oregon
Harrisburg - Pennsylvania
Providence - Rhode Island
Columbia - South Carolina
Pierre - South Dakota
Nashville - Tennessee
Austin - Texas
Salt Lake City - Utah
Montpelier - Vermont
Richmond - Virginia
Olympia - Washington
Charleston - West Virginia
Madison - Wisconsin
Cheyenne - Wyoming
I would assume that this is a multiple choices question, thus the answer would be letter the first statement after the claim. "because human behavior may be patterned, but it is also spontaneous". Creating a central dogma in sociology would be like creating a central dogma of explaining humanity. As there are always the spontaneous nature of humanity, making prediction out of patterned behavior could be flawed. <span />
