Believe that it is an extension to the commandments
Answer:
This question is really geared more towards your own interpretation, so there isn't necessarily going to be a right or wrong answer. I would say that today the first amendment protects when people are speaking out against policies and general injustices in the American society today, and for instance, on social media I have seen people say "f trump and f america." The first amendment is protecting them, so that nobody can hold that statement against them and press charges. If we lived in russia, the russian secret police would find you, and kill you for that. Personally, I believe that if someone wanted to burn an american flag on their front lawn, and curse america, they should not be protected by the first amendment. that should be a crime. However, the first amendment does protect them, so there is nothing anyone could do about that legally.
Explanation:
The four types of economic assumptions that can negatively affect the environment are:
1. N<span>atural resources and human resources are infinite
2. It g</span><span>rants an event in the future less value than one in the present; short-term costs and benefits are granted more importance than longterm costs and benefits.
3. A</span>ll costs and benefits associated with an exchange of goods or services are borne by individuals engaging directly in the transaction (<span>buyer and seller alone).
</span>4. E<span>conomic growth is required to keep employment high and maintain social order.</span>
With the GDP per capita, this depends on the wealth and the population of a country. For somewhere such as the Arab Emirates, they have a small population, but a fair amount of wealth, so this then increases the GDP. The situation is similar with Kuwait. Iran has also been affected by War, meaning that some of the infrastructure will hav been destroyed, and that people would not be able to work and make money, which is then something that will have a direct impact on the GDP. With countries such as Jordan and Sudan, As far as I'm aware, they are relatively poor countries with a high population, meaning that the GDP will be lower and split between more people,therefore, meaning that it will be low. With regards to A). Iran is a country that has definitely been affected by this, following the war. B) A large majority of the countries that have been mentioned are also predominately desert, so where there is not people that are making money, this is something that is then not contributing to the GDP. Countries such as Kuwait and UAE also have large oil reserves, and this is something that can contribute to wealth hugely, and the smaller the population, the less people the GDP has to be spread between, and therefore, this increases it. With environmental disasters, these can have a huge impact, and the amount of money that is being made is also greatly reduced, and the expenditure is also increased, which is also something that can decrease the GDP.
Hope this helps you!
The relief program was successful because it created a lot of job opportunities. 33 thousand buildings for various governmental and civil necessities were built which created job opportunities for many Americans. Economy was mostly fixed except for unemployment, which was a part of the relief program. Reform was introduced through social security acts, trust busting, and many other things.
