1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Georgia [21]
3 years ago
13

To what extent were the Jacksonian Democrats guardians of political democracy and the United States constitution ?

History
1 answer:
ivolga24 [154]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Jacksonian Democrats viewed themselves as the guardians of the United States constitution, political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity, but in truth, their record is an inconsistent one. A main issue of the Jacksonian Era was the call for equal economic opportunity.

You might be interested in
The amendments that lowered the voting age to eighteen and gave women the right to vote were
artcher [175]

Answer:

<h2>The Nineteenth Amendment and the Twenty-sixth Amendment</h2>
  • The 19th Amendment gave women the right to vote.
  • The 26th Amendment lowered the voting age from 21 to 18.

Context/details:

19th Amendment

The 19th Amendment to the Constitution reads as follows:

  • <em>The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.</em>
  • <em>Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.</em>

The proposal to add such an amendment was first introduced in Congress in 1878, but Congress did not pass the amendment till 1919 -- after the experience of women taking on greater roles in the country during the First World War.  The amendment achieved ratification by a sufficient number of states and was added to the Constitution by August, 1920.

26th Amendment

During the 1960s in America, protests against the Vietnam War were active on college campuses across the country.  Part of those protests were the demands of young people chanting, "Old enough to fight, old enough to vote."  Since 18 was old enough to be drafted to fight in the war, young people argued for their right to vote as full citizens.

The 26th Amendment was passed by Congress on March 23, 1971.  It was ratified by the states faster than any other amendment, achieving ratification by July 1, 1971.

The 26th Amendment is worded as follows:  

  • <em>Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States, who are eighteen years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of age.</em>
  • <em>Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.</em>
7 0
3 years ago
Why were de la Casas arguments important?
Art [367]
Answer: While the Pope had granted Spain sovereignty over the New World, de Las Casas argued that the property rights and rights to their own labor still belonged to the native peoples. Natives were subjects of the Spanish crown, and to treat them as less than human violated the laws of God, nature, and Spain.
3 0
3 years ago
Why doesn’t Polyneices receive an honorable burial?
frez [133]

Answer: Because he went committed treason

Explanation:

Creon exiled Oedipus from Thebes after Oedipus killed his father and married his mom. Creon also declared that Polyneices would not recieve a proper burial

3 0
3 years ago
One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the
Elanso [62]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

One of the “don’ts” in analyzing or evaluating a primary source is to avoid recreating the author’s experience of his society.

No, I don't agree with this statement because I consider that in order to truly understand the primary source, a good researcher has to understand the circumstance and the time in which the primary source was created.

This means, if it was during a war or a revolutionary period, the researcher has to understand and think as the author of the source did.

ANd I am clear using my words: understand. Not biasing the records, the facts, or misinterpret the situation, the context, or the facts.

5 0
3 years ago
Describe at least two reasons why the nations founders decided to replace the articles of confederation with the United States c
almond37 [142]

Answer: “In short, the Articles of Confederation did not give the federal government enough power. Under them, there was no president and the country was run only by Congress. Without a centralized power, there was no national currency, few national laws, and no national army. This system proved ineffective, so the Constitution was created. Under the Constitution, stability and unity increased in the new nation”

Written by-SteveDionisiou

‘I did not write any of this, all the credit goes to Steve Dionisiou, just wanted to give you the answer you were asking about’

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • List two natural rights that John Locke discussed
    7·2 answers
  • Question 3 of 10
    13·2 answers
  • What is the structure of the American system of government is based on?
    8·2 answers
  • How are independent executive agencies different from cabinet executive agencies
    13·2 answers
  • during the feudal period in Europe, power and position in society were based on the A) amount of land possessed B) level of educ
    8·1 answer
  • The ten constitutional amendments that eventually became the bill of rights caused heated disagreements between what two groups
    6·2 answers
  • Which country had better relations with the Native Americans?
    6·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS
    9·1 answer
  • Which was a weakness according to the Articles of Confederation?
    14·1 answer
  • What do you think it means that the
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!