Answer: When we inhabit the world, we are constantly seeing. Perception is an ongoing reality—we are always taking in the world, and only after the fact do we name it. Thus begins Ways of Seeing, drawing our attention to the fraught relationship between vision, images, words, and meaning. Our understanding of what we see doesn't generally align with the objective facts of what we're seeing: for example, we see the sun set every night, while we know that it isn't really "setting," but rather, the earth is simply revolving away from it. Likewise, we can attempt to capture what we see, reproducing or recreating it for others so that they can try to understand how we perceive the world. To do so is to create an image: "an image is a sight which has been recreated or reproduced." In so doing, we remove the image from the original circumstances under which it was seen. In this sense, every image embodies what Berger calls "a way of seeing": a record of how its creator saw the world. Images can preserve things as they once were, and simultaneously, preserve how their creator once saw their subject. Images, more so than any other relics from the past, offer a direct testimony as to how people saw—and, by extension, understood—the world.
Explanation:
<span>Pyramus and Thisbe, who were neighbors, were planning on eloping, but Romeo and Juliet actually got married. They both had families that didn't like each other. Thisbe goes out with the plan first to mean by the tomb, but a lion scares her away, and Pyramus thinks the lion ate her. Pyramus, like Romeo, falsely believes his love is dead. Pyramus dies by his sword (Romeo did poison). Thisbe comes back, and she stabs herself with the same sword (Juliet used a dagger, which also belonged to her lover.) In Pyramus and Thisbe, there is an explanation of why mulberries are red: it's because of the blood. Shakespeare didn't use his story to explain an occurrence in nature. </span>
<span>The phrase is an object phrase that depends on other information in order to make sense. If the phrase were alone, without a subject, then the information would be insufficient to derive any actual meaning. Clarifying questions would have to be asked, including "Who" or "What" won the award.</span>
Answer: Upon reading the Title "Abuelito who?" it makes me wonder, who's Abuelito? and who is the who referring too? Was it saying Abuelito who..... did something? It might be about an Abuelito who felt something or did something, it raises many questions.
Hope this helps :)
The answer to the question above is "The poem relies more on pathos than the speech does" based on the type of persuasion used in the text. The pathos is a type persuasion which a writer or speaker used by manifesting certain emotion of the audiences<span>. The poem tended to manifest pity emotion from the audiences.</span>
