In my opinion, George Washington's Farewell Address was a fair and clear warning against political parties/alliances. The reason being is because, having all these alliances and political parties would cause a war. If everyone stated their opinions, and someone doesn't like it, then they will fight about it until the conflict is resolved. Republicans formed a number of societies and clubs throughout the nation, which spread criticism of Washington's political decisions. This caused the birth of the Republican Party after Thomas Jefferson resigned from Washington's cabinet. Washington was against the Federalists which caused a little conflict with the Republican Party. Further more, more evidence provides that Washington's address was a fair warning, due to the fact that more conflict grew in his later term of presidency. Battles raged in the press, attacking one's political views. All in all, i would say that Washington's Farewell Address was a fair, and clear warning. It was correct in my opinion. hope this helped, have an amazing day :)<span />
Answer: Assyrians
Explanation:
Nebopolassar led a revolt in 672 BC against the Assyrians and was crowned king of babylon.
Answer:
I am assuming that people traveled by walking, on horse, in a carriage, by boat, and steam engine.
Explanation:
Answer:
The pharaoh owned all land and wealth.
Explanation:
While Pharaoh also served as a religious leader in ancient Egypt, his roles in the economy of Egypt includes the following:
1. He collected taxes
2. He controlled all the lands in Egypt. Part of his title is 'Lord of the Two Lands' as he controlled upper Egypt and lower Egypt altogether.
3. He made laws including those relating to economic policies.
Hence, Pharaoh's role in the economy can be considered to be "The pharaoh owned all land and wealth."
