Answer:
The owner's equity at the end of the year results to $64,400
Explanation:
We are able to calculate this through simple addition and subtraction
First we must view how much was payed through tax
t = 4,200 - 3,200 = 1,000
58,900 - 1,000 = 57,900
Than, due to the repurchase of $6,500 of stock, we must include this within our final equation
57,900 + 6,500 = 64,400
Hope this helps
Answer:
Following are the solution to the given point.
Explanation:
Calculate each fund's Sharpe ratio. It Fund is the best danger reward with the highest Sharpe ratio.
Fund C consequently offers the best risk-benefit. and without understanding client risk preference, we will advise Fund C for any clients. If a client wants to have a 22 percent minimum volatility, we'll nevertheless propose that Fund C instead of Fund B is available, because an investor can take risk-free rates to the degree that the total portfolio volatility stands at 22 percent and deposit it in Fund C.
Answer:
Accounts receivable (Dr.) $1,075
Sales revenue (Cr.) $1,075
Cost of goods sold (Dr.) 800
Finished goods (Cr.) 800
where
Dr. = Debit
Cr. = Credit
Explanation:
The inventory account of a manufacturing firm has three sub-accounts: Raw materials, Work-in-process, and Finished goods. The goods purchased by the company were sold without any work done. It means that they were purchased in finished form, so, the company will record these goods in its finished goods inventory. When goods are sold, we have to record sales and receivable. AND on the same time, under perpetual inventory system, the cost of goods that are sold and inventory account are also adjusted to reflect the changes.
Answer: a) The court found that the advertisements were not inherently misleading. However, it did find that regulating the advertisement in question was more extensive than necessary to protect the public interest.
Explanation: An advertisement is a notice or action promoting a product or service and soliciting patronage.
When there is no regulation of an advert, abuse is expected. Protecting the public interest is important as advertisement may be misleading if there are no extensive rules.
In a situation whereby the mechanics advertisement was found not to be inherently misleading, a different verdict may have been given.
