All categories

2 years ago

Please help I need help with this homework ASAP!!

Mathematics

1 answer:

WARRIOR [948]2 years ago

6 0

8/12 and 4/6 and10/15 and20/30 and 40/60

You might be interested in

Write the slope-intercept form of the equation of each line

Lesechka [4]

Answer:

slope= rise/run=y/x=y2-y1/x2-x1

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

What is the theoretical probability of rolling a sum of 8 on one roll of two standard number cubes

Vesnalui [34]

I just took the test, the answer is 5/36.

3 0

2 years ago

Which is the following is equivalent to 24/80?

lutik1710 [3]

Answer: 3/10

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

For each of the following, use logic laws to decide whether the statement is a tautology contradiction, or neither. a (a) (A B)

spayn [35]

Answer:

The statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ is a contingency.

The statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ is a contradiction.

Step-by-step explanation:

A tautology is a proposition that is always true.

A contradiction is a proposition that is always false.

A contingency is a proposition that is neither a tautology nor a contradiction.

a) To classify the statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ , you need to use the logic laws as follows:

$(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A) \equiv$

$\equiv (\lnot A \lor\lnot B)\land(\lnot B \lor A)$ by the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv (\lnot B\lor \lnot A )\land(\lnot B \lor A)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor (\lnot A \land A)$ by Distributive law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor (A \land \lnot A)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv \lnot B \lor F$ by the Negation law.

Therefore the statement $(A\rightarrow \lnot B)\land (B\rightarrow A)$ is a contingency.

b) To classify the statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ , you need to use the logic laws as follows:

$(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P \equiv$

$\equiv (\lnot P \lor \lnot P)\land P$ by the logical equivalence involving conditional statement.

$\equiv P \land (\lnot P \lor \lnot P)$ by the Commutative law.

$\equiv (P \land \lnot P) \lor (P \land \lnot P)$ by Distributive law.

$\equiv F \lor F \equiv F$ by the Negation law.

Therefore the statement $(P\rightarrow \lnot P)\land P$ is a contradiction.

8 0

3 years ago

Need help ASAP !!!!!!!!!!!

Lana71 [14]

i think the answer b or c

i hope this help

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers