Answer:
The correct answer here is the Hindu Kush and the Himalayas Mountains.
Explanation:
The Mughal Empire was an empire on the Indian subcontinent that existed from 1526. until its dissolution in 1857. The north borders of the empire were the Hindu Kush mountains and the Himalayas Mountains. These two massive geographical obstacles prevented the empire form expanding further north as they were almost impossible to cross with large armies.
Answer:
The Barons of England were angry with the King and eventually rebelled against him because he over-taxed them for his unproductive wars in French territory and forced him to sign the Magna Carta which limited his power as King.
They eventually gained leverage because the English monarchy needed money to pay ransom for John's brother who was abducted and made prisoner by Emperor Henry VI and to fund the Crusades.
Answer: whoever your legal guardian is at the time of your birth or where your guardian is at is where your citizenship will reside.
Explanation: In most situations, any child that is born in the United States or one of its territories will automatically receive American citizenship. ... All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside
Slaves were forbidden to leave the owner's property unless they were accompanied by a white person or had permission so in other words to keep them in check.
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
