Question

PLEASE HELP ME, I am no good at Minnesota studies and I will award someone the brainiest if they have all the right answers and im giving 50 points for this question
1. One comment that sparked outrage among the Dakota was trader Andrew Myrick's response to the Dakota being hungry. What did the trader say?
a. "the U.S. government is not responsible for helping these people"
b. "they can hunt their own food; they do not need to rely on the government" c. "let them eat grass"
or d. " we are not responsible for feeding them."

2. what was the perspective of Little Crow about going to war with the government?

a. he fully supported the Dakota killing settlers and taking them hostage

b. he preferred a more peaceful approach but did agree to go to war

c. he left the tribe and supported the settlers

d. he did not care because he and his family had enough to eat

3. how did the treaties contribute to the start of the U.S. Dakota war?

a. the treaties gave large amounts of land to the Dakota, but the Dakota were angry that the U.S. government would not give them more land

b. the agreements made in the treaties were unfullfilled, leaving the Dakota hungry and angry

c. agreements were kept, but the Dakota kept asking for more

d. the treaties had no impact on the start of the war


PLZ HELP! 50 points and someone will be awarded braniest

Answer 1

For question 1, Andrew Myrick said " So as far as I'm concerned, if they are hungry let them eat their own dung (dung meaning poop) or grass." That got a lot of people angered.

I'll answer the other 2 shortly.

Answer 2

1. He said to C. "let them eat grass."

2. B. He preferred a more peaceful approach but did agree to go to war.

3. B. the agreements made in the treaties were unfullfilled, leaving the Dakota hungry and angry