3 years ago

HELP! 25 POINTS

1 answer:

3 0

Well, with the Dawes Act, native Americans were separated and stripped of their land.
Only those who accepted it and allowed the others to do this to them could become US citizens.

But the thing that went wrong is that the people who wanted to enroll this onto them didn't bring their culture and family beings into consideration, therefore many Native Americans didn't want to going through with this just to become a member in the US.

A couple of adjustments that you could make from the plan is don't strip them of their land and give them more of a choice with becoming a US citizen. Entirely, the natives had their land taken, therefore with no land they couldn't survive, forcing them to become a US citizen to get their rights and land back, all together, proving unfair.

You might be interested in

Two ways that the free enterprise system works to break down the three powers of monopolies noted (higher prices, Barriers to en

worty [1.4K]

<span>The two ways are: the free enterprise system can yield negative effects when they lessen competition and look after incompetent competitors. Additionally, outcomes are infuriating when over head costs of legal intervention are bigger than the benefits for the consumers.</span>

4 0

4 years ago

People who focus on the forces in society that promote competition and change employ the

kondor19780726 [428]

A : Conflict Perspective

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

what do you think most likely would have happened if thw pilgrima did not agree to self- government?

Naddika [18.5K]

Answer:

There would most definingly be a war