1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dangina [55]
3 years ago
6

HELP! 25 POINTS

History
1 answer:
liberstina [14]3 years ago
3 0
Well, with the Dawes Act, native Americans were separated and stripped of their land.
Only those who accepted it and allowed the others to do this to them could become US citizens.

But the thing that went wrong is that the people who wanted to enroll this onto them didn't bring their culture and family beings into consideration, therefore many Native Americans didn't want to going through with this just to become a member in the US.

A couple of adjustments that you could make from the plan is don't strip them of their land and give them more of a choice with becoming a US citizen. Entirely, the natives had their land taken, therefore with no land they couldn't survive, forcing them to become a US citizen to get their rights and land back, all together, proving unfair.
You might be interested in
The chief reason people make economic choices is because:
sergiy2304 [10]
Is because people think different on things and always have different opinions
4 0
4 years ago
What were four key differences among the 13 colonies?​
gogolik [260]

Answer:

So first of all what does the word colony. Mean well a colony is land that is settled. Or taken over by another country for example the 13 colonies were settled by european.

5 0
3 years ago
Christianity had its beginnings in which Roman province
Aleksandr [31]
Judea Christianity had its beginnings
7 0
3 years ago
The map shows alliances just before the start of World
Leni [432]

Answer:

i think Austria-Hungary and italy  

Explanation:

they are in red??

8 0
2 years ago
What was nicholas ii response to the revolution of 1905?
Over [174]
What was Nicholas II's response to the revolution of 1905?

Nicholas II created the Duma to represent the people in response to the revolution of 1905.

Tsar Nicholas II had two basic responses:

He created the Duma, supposedly to be a democratically elected legislative body to make laws the even the Tsar would have to obey. He soon began to ignore whatever it did and even dissolved the first one. He never let it become a true legislative body despite his promises.He issued the October Manifesto which declared that the Russian people would have more personal freedoms than before. The Tsar also ignored these promises.

The Tsar's empty promises quelled the 1905 revolution, but his gradual failure to make good on his promises led to the people having a deep distrust of the Tsar and eventually when the February Revolution broke out in 1917, no one would accept his empty promises of reform and he was forced to abdicate the throne

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did religion, natural resources, and location each determine the prosperity of African societies?
    15·1 answer
  • The Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo provided all of the following except ______?
    10·1 answer
  • Most colonists placed a high value on education. True or False?
    7·1 answer
  • Look at the green shaded part of the first map then explain how the u.s gained all that land from the border to the Pacific Ocea
    14·1 answer
  • What are some expectations that you have of your government
    13·1 answer
  • What happened to Alsace-Lorraine after World War 1
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the factors that led people to form the counterculture movement, and what factors led to its decline
    11·1 answer
  • How did nationalism add to antisemitism?​
    14·1 answer
  • Phong trào đồng khởi (1959 1960) ở miền nam Việt nam đã làm lung lay tận gốc chính quyền ngô đình diệm vì
    11·1 answer
  • Please help
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!