Answer:
The sentence that is punctuated correctly is:
1. I wouldn't eat those cabbages if I were you.
Explanation:
We may be tempted to add a comma when we see "if" in a sentence, but we must think twice before we do. <u>We will only need that comma if the clause that contains the "if" is the first one.</u> For example:
- If you see her, tell her to call me.
However, <u>when the if-clause is the second one, there is not need for the comma at all:</u>
- Tell her to call me if you see her.
With that in mind, we can choose the first option as the correct one:
1. I wouldn't eat those cabbages if I were you.
Answer:
3 very big puppets on a couch in there too looking in through a window
Answer:
"The Metamorphosis" by Franz Kafka tells the story of Gregor who was changed into an insect and his life living as a bug. But irrespective of his physical appearance, he never complains or questions it. Instead, he remained calm throughout.
Explanation:
In The Metamorphosis, Kafka makes it evident that Gregor endures a hellish existence as <u>a travelling salesman</u>. Being the sole <u>breadwinner/ earner</u> of the family also takes its toll. He yearns to be free of his job and his familial obligations. It seems as though his wish has been granted when he is transformed into an insect. However, Gregor cannot bask in the joy of his freedom because his physical condition causes<u> the loss of his job and also the limitations of his abilities as an insect</u>, and he is forced to live within the confines of his room. Gregor’s condition is also a symbol of his <u>alienation and separation </u>from society, which burdens him with too many expectations and unrealistic goals.
Answer:
E). The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.
Explanation:
As per the question, option E displays the assumption 'the Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members' on which the argument lies as it is rightly assumed by logic. This assumption clearly justifies the conclusion 'lesser affluent families receiving a fee reduction' aptly. The other options fail to validate the conclusion as it offers an illogical yet inappropriate claim. Therefore, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer as it reasonably justifies the claim/argument.
I believe the answer is: She must decide between remaining loyal to her family and telling the truth.
Diray 33 tell a story about a woman who had to be involved in a trial for the wrongdoings which are related to her family. This woman truly know that her family is involved in a morally wrong activities, so she is torn between telling the truth in the trial or choose to be silent and help her family.
