Answer:
Bob contributed to his injury and apportioned damages
Explanation:
Under pure form of comparative negligence, a defendant is only responsible for the proportion of fault arising out of his negligence. The plaintiff is still allowed a compensation against damages even if he himself contributed to such a fault.
Comparative negligence mentions that whenever an accident takes place, the total negligence is a sum of proportionate negligence by each party, which contributed to such accident.
In such case, the negligence for an accident cannot be placed upon one party alone.
In the given case, since Bob filed a suit in a state that adopts pure form of comparative negligence, he shall be eligible to some compensation even if the fault was majorly his. Though, the quantum of compensation shall be based upon the determined fault of each party to the accident.
Answer:
Juan should be told the rules and regulations, so it can guide her.
Explanation:
She will note that if she specifies the rules and explanations for her concerns, Juan will have a greater chance of complying. Juan is still 4 years old and at that stage of development, children needs to be thought by giving them instructions because they learn better through proper guidance and instructions.
Juan should be told what is right or wrong to do, and be guided appropriately well.
I believe the answer is: <span>Natural Rights
</span><span>Natural Rights in united states includes the right to live, the right of liberty, and the right to own properties and accumulate wealth.
None of the government officials have the power to take this from any legal citizens no matter how high their positions are.
</span>
Answer:
a. truth bias
Explanation:
Truth bias: Th term truth bias is defined as the phenomenon through which a person assumes that his or her partner is telling the truth even in the absence of any particular evidence. It occurs because mostly partners tell the truth.
In other words, people tend to believe others without having a shred of evidence to the contrary, and often considered as normal because people do trust each other completely who shares a good bond.
In the question above, Cassie’s inability to suspect Nathan of cheating demonstrates the concept of truth bias.
