<span>The correct answer is b. Option a is incorrect because these models can demonstrate scientific theories, but they don't prove scientific theories (you would need experiments for that). Option c is incorrect because the models aren't always representing something abstract (i.e. DNA is very real, just very small). Option d is incorrect because they don't precisely mimic something in nature, but instead help us visualize something in nature that is difficult to see or comprehend.</span>
Answer:
This question is incomplete but the completed question is below
eeds that are planted upside down are still able to grow into mature plants. Which explanation best explains this phenomenon?
(a)The roots change into branches, and the branches turn into roots.
(b)The roots grow toward the force of gravity, and the shoots grow away.
(c)The plant will become a smaller version of a mature plant.
(d)Roots always grow toward the dark, and shoots grow toward the light.
Two options appear to be correct here: options B and D
Explanation:
Regardless of the direction the seed is planted, the seed has the ability to re-position itself via the help of growth hormones that respond to gravity and redirect the seed into the proper orientation. However, after re-orientation of the seed, the root grows toward the direction of gravity (a process known as gravitropism) while the shoot grows toward the direction of sunlight (a process known as phototropism). Even though two options appear to be correct here, the most correct option based on he question is b
It is not possible for two species with the same niche to coexist. one species will eventually drive the other into extinction
true, because it is called rotation on google
