These explanations "make people feel safer and the
world more comprehensible".
The just-world hypothesis otherwise
called just world fallacy is the cognitive inclination or supposition that a
man's activities are innately disposed to convey ethically reasonable and
fitting results to that individual, to the finish of every honorable activity
being in the end compensated and every insidious activity inevitably rebuffed.
Proportional representation
Answer:
well according to dora u need a map to find where to go and the map is your best friend
Explanation:
<span>This shows that there is a statistically significant difference between the two parties on the idea. The null hypothesis would have shown that there is no difference in the two parties. Party affiliation, then, will likely be indicative of the level of a person's support for the concept of welfare reform.</span>