Look at the first answer that is the correct one not mine
Yes, because morally, it’s the right thing to do. Our common humanity means that those of us who are doing well (often doing <em>too</em> well) should help those whose basic needs are not met. And, in part, our personal and national wealth has often been created by the exploitation of poor people – colonial extraction of resources, the slavery and opium trades, unfair international trade and finance practices and others. Reallocating just <em>1% of global wealth</em> would eradicate extreme income poverty at a stroke. Those of us who are ‘better-off’ would be stupid not to help the poor. If we want a prosperous, politically stable and environmentally sustainable world for ourselves (and for future generations), then we have to help poor people in poorer, less fortunate lands.
Hope this helps, honey. Best of luck with assignments like these.
Answer:
The answer is extraversion.
Explanation:
As described by the Big Five model, extraversion refers to high amounts of social interaction and talkativeness. They enjoy being the center of attention and usually will conform to other people's activities.
People with low levels of extraversion (called introverts) may feel tired after social meetings. They avoid crowded places and dislike small talk. Instead, they are thoughtful and enjoy engaging in meaningful conversations.
When water flows back into the ocean it is called
I found this to explain so much. However the answer you're looking for is. preconscious