1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ExtremeBDS [4]
3 years ago
14

How did the new deal legislation try to stabilize agriculture and industry

History
1 answer:
Marina86 [1]3 years ago
7 0
The New Deal tried to stabilize agriculture by implementing the AAA. The AAA (Agricultural Adjustment Act) paid farmers not to make more of their crops. Franklin D. Roosevelt did this because farmers had created a surplus of goods, meaning they had produced more goods than consumers wanted to buy. This surplus lead to a sharp decline in price. By stopping the farmers from farming, it helped to increase the price of goods, as there would no longer be a surplus once citizens kept buying the goods.

The New Deal tried to stabilize industry by creating the National Recovery Administration (NRA). This focused on having the government and businesses work together in order to establish a code of ethics for businesses and to set prices for goods in order to stimulate the economy.
You might be interested in
What two religions began on Indian subcontinent
Alex
I think Jainism is one but I don't know about the other one
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Due to economic, social, and political interests, America's interactions with Europe at the end of the 19th Century were deeply
V125BC [204]
Nonexistant is the answer!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why westward expansion create more conflict between the north and south
Eva8 [605]

In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French government for $15 million. The Louisiana Purchase stretched from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains and from Canada to New Orleans, and it doubled the size of the United States. To Jefferson, westward expansion was the key to the nation’s health: He believed that a republic depended on an independent, virtuous citizenry for its survival, and that independence and virtue went hand in hand with land ownership, especially the ownership of small farms. (“Those who labor in the earth,” he wrote, “are the chosen people of God.”) In order to provide enough land to sustain this ideal population of virtuous yeomen, the United States would have to continue to expand. The westward expansion of the United States is one of the defining themes of 19th-century American history, but it is not just the story of Jefferson’s expanding “empire of liberty.” On the contrary, as one historian writes, in the six decades after the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion “very nearly destroy[ed] the republic.”

Manifest Destiny

By 1840, nearly 7 million Americans–40 percent of the nation’s population–lived in the trans-Appalachian West. Following a trail blazed by Lewis and Clark, most of these people had left their homes in the East in search of economic opportunity. Like Thomas Jefferson, many of these pioneers associated westward migration, land ownership and farming with freedom. In Europe, large numbers of factory workers formed a dependent and seemingly permanent working class; by contrast, in the United States, the western frontier offered the possibility of independence and upward mobility for all. In 1843, one thousand pioneers took to the Oregon Trail as part of the “Great Emigration.”

Did you know? In 1853, the Gadsden Purchase added about 30,000 square miles of Mexican territory to the United States and fixed the boundaries of the “lower 48” where they are today.

In 1845, a journalist named John O’Sullivan put a name to the idea that helped pull many pioneers toward the western frontier. Westward migration was an essential part of the republican project, he argued, and it was Americans’ “manifest destiny” to carry the “great experiment of liberty” to the edge of the continent: to “overspread and to possess the whole of the [land] which Providence has given us,” O’Sullivan wrote. The survival of American freedom depended on it.

Westward Expansion and Slavery

Meanwhile, the question of whether or not slavery would be allowed in the new western states shadowed every conversation about the frontier. In 1820, the Missouri Compromise had attempted to resolve this question: It had admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. More important, it had stipulated that in the future, slavery would be prohibited north of the southern boundary of Missouri (the 36º30’ parallel) in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase.

However, the Missouri Compromise did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. The Southern economy grew increasingly dependent on “King Cotton” and the system of forced labor that sustained it. Meanwhile, more and more Northerners came to believed that the expansion of slavery impinged upon their own liberty, both as citizens–the pro-slavery majority in Congress did not seem to represent their interests–and as yeoman farmers. They did not necessarily object to slavery itself, but they resented the way its expansion seemed to interfere with their own economic opportunity.

Westward Expansion and the Mexican War

Despite this sectional conflict, Americans kept on migrating West in the years after the Missouri Compromise was adopted. Thousands of people crossed the Rockies to the Oregon Territory, which belonged to Great Britain, and thousands more moved into the Mexican territories of California, New Mexico and Texas. In 1837, American settlers in Texas joined with their Tejano neighbors (Texans of Spanish origin) and won independence from Mexico. They petitioned to join the United States as a slave state.

3 0
3 years ago
DUE IN 10 MINUTES <br><br> What do headlines such as these from the 1920's illustrate?
mina [271]

Answer:

Explanation:

B dose

4 0
2 years ago
How did Rome's attitude to philosophy evolve over time? Why did they prefer Stoicism?
8_murik_8 [283]

Answer:

Stoicism was the school of thought that was flourished in Greek and Roman. This is the loftiest history of Stoicism that is recorded in western civilization.

Explanation:

The stoicism was flourished in Rome in the mid-second century. There were two famous and chief philosophers at that time named Rodes and Panaetius.

Both of them were the disciples of Poseidonius. Panaetius has been arranged a school of stoicism in Rome. It happened before Athens comes to Rome.

Poseidon was a religious man whose influence was seen on people. Both the doctrine were opposite to each other.

Chrysippus believed in staying away from a Stoicism school. Chrysippus was commended to defend Stoic logic and the epistemology.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Ap world history question 1 free response 2004
    11·2 answers
  • What can you do to make sure you have a healthy credit report
    7·1 answer
  • 6. Which type of colony was each of these?<br><br> - Massachusetts<br> - Pennsylvania<br> - Virginia
    13·1 answer
  • Analyze ONE example from the Greek city-states of attitudes towards society and social structure.
    11·1 answer
  • What are the 3 Major accomplishments of Egypt
    9·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer from the drop-down menu.
    9·2 answers
  • Some American colonists believed they were justified in declaring independence from Great Britain because the British government
    6·1 answer
  • What happened to people who protested apartheid in South Africa?
    11·1 answer
  • PLZZZ HELPPP
    12·1 answer
  • How was the move toward realism reflected in American art and literature?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!