Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Expression => | -2 |
Equation => 6 - 1 = 2 + 3
Inequality => 8^m > 64
2x + 5y = -3 ⇒ 2x + 5y = -3
1x + 8y = 4 ⇒ <u>2x + 16y = 8
</u> -<u>11y</u> = <u>-11 </u>
-11 -11
y = 1
2x + 5(1) = -3
2x + 5 = -3
<u> -5 -5</u>
<u>2x</u> = <u>-8</u>
2 2
x = -4
(x, y) = (-4, 1)
2x + 1y = 7 ⇒ 2x + 1y = 7
1x - 2y = -14 ⇒ <u>2x - 4y = -28</u>
<u>5y</u> = <u>35</u>
5 5
y = 7
2x + 7 = 7
<u> -7 -7</u>
<u>2x</u> = <u>0</u>
2 2
x = 0
(x, y) = (0, 7)
The maximum weight that could be held would be 32 pounds. or six five pound weights taking up 18 inches of space, and weighing 30 Lbs, and two one pound weights adding another two inches. You could achieve a greater weight if you had a weight of one-half inch, in which case you could take six 5 lb weights and 1 two pound weight, then you could add a half inch weight bringing the weight to over 32 inches. Since we don't have a half inch weight we can't raise the weight above 32lbs.
Answer:
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean is 
The sample size is n = 25
The sample mean is 
The standard deviation is 
Let assume the level of significance of this test is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as

=> 
=> 
Generally from the student t distribution table the probability of obtaining
to the right of the curve at a degree of freedom of
is

From the value obtained we see that
hence
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is no sufficient evidence to show that the designer's claim of a better shoe is supported by the trial results.