Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
Both are correct
Explanation:
It is nature-nurture controversy or debate which focuses on an individual's personal behavioral traits to be a product or result of either genetics inheritance or acquired influences.
On one side, some psychologist and other natural sciences argue that behavioral traits and characteristics of a person can be explained by genetics as nature is per- wiring.
On the other hand, other social sciences and sociologist argues that human behavior is learned and shaped through social interaction and nurture.
Thus both genetics and human interaction and environment contributes to the human behavior.
Therefore, both the views are correct.
Answer: Prior to being crowned King of England, what country was James I King of Scotland.
Answer:
a magazine if it wrong tell me plz
Explanation:
